Skip to main content

Security report for ipro.lv

iPro SIA · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iPro SIA is a Latvian IT services company specializing in data storage, virtualization, IT security, and data center solutions. The company targets business clients primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region, offering technology-driven solutions to improve business efficiency and security. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear service offerings and contact information. Technically, the site uses a CMS (DIRcms) and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, with room for improvement in security transparency and mobile optimization.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ipro.lv. View the latest report
3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
4of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipro.lv

This scan found 14 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid position in the local IT services market, focusing on enterprise IT infrastructure solutions. Their business model revolves around consulting and providing technology solutions to reduce costs and enhance security for clients. The presence of news updates and social media links suggests active engagement with clients and partners. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation. The company registration and contact details are clearly presented, supporting business credibility. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools shows an emphasis on digital marketing and customer insights.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for mature security postures. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience across devices.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
iPro SIA
Registration number
40003521916
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iPro SIA
Description
Jūs paši vislabāk saprotat, kā attīstīt savu biznesu. Savukārt mēs zinām, kā šim nolūkam izmantot informācijas tehnoloģijas. Apvienojot abas šīs zināšanas, mēs palīdzam klientiem samazināt izmaksas, paaugstināt informācijas drošības līmeni un uzlabot biznesa procesu efektivitāti.
Key services
Datu glabāšana, Virtualizācija, IT-drošība, Datu centri
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sumo, DIRcms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Sumo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused and professionally presented.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  6. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on DIRcms, a Latvian CMS platform, and uses common JavaScript libraries like jQuery. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Sumo for visitor engagement and tracking. The site loads asynchronously many scripts, which may impact performance moderately. The design is professional with clear navigation and multilingual support. However, mobile optimization and accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No advanced frameworks or platforms were detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium25 findingsView report
  2. 69/100 +8Medium25 findingsView report
  3. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  4. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  5. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  6. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  7. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  8. 61/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipro.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipro.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.