Skip to main content

Security report for ipro.lv

iPro · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iPro is a Latvia-based IT solutions provider specializing in enterprise-grade security and IT infrastructure services. The company offers a comprehensive portfolio including cybersecurity, data center infrastructure, networking, cloud solutions, and managed security services. Positioned as a trusted regional player, iPro targets businesses seeking robust, scalable, and compliant IT solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by certifications such as ISO 27001 and compliance with GDPR and NIS2 standards. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and consent management tools like Yoast SEO and Cookiebot, ensuring good digital maturity and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although incident response contact details and terms of service are absent. Overall, iPro demonstrates a mature security and compliance stance appropriate for its industry and market segment.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ipro.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipro.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iPro operates in the technology sector, focusing on B2B IT security and infrastructure solutions. Their business model centers on delivering tailored IT services that address evolving cybersecurity threats and infrastructure demands. The company leverages certifications and compliance frameworks to build trust and differentiate itself in a competitive market. Their partnership ecosystem includes recognized platforms like Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms, which may streamline lead management. The company’s social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn supports brand visibility and client engagement. Growth indicators include a diverse service portfolio and adherence to international standards, positioning iPro for sustained regional relevance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and robust cookie consent mechanisms. The use of Cookiebot ensures GDPR-compliant user consent management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit incident response contact information and a security.txt file indicates room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident handling transparency. Compliance with ISO 27001 and NIS2 frameworks is highlighted, reflecting organizational commitment to security best practices. Overall, the security posture is strong, minimizing risks related to data breaches and regulatory non-compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  2. Add explicit incident response and abuse contact channels to improve security transparency.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Include direct company contact emails and phone numbers to enhance communication trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and consent mechanisms to maintain compliance and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iPro
Description
Enterprise-grade security and IT solutions that protect, scale, and simplify your infrastructure—so your team can focus on what matters most.
Key services
Cybersecurity, Data Center Infrastructure, Networking, Cloud Solutions, Managed Security Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Yoast SEO, WordPress
Frameworks
Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern consent management with Cookiebot
  2. Strong SEO and structured data implementation
  3. Clear business focus on IT security and infrastructure
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form only
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Good use of social media for business presence
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of external scripts and resource loading. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence with scalable and maintainable components, though continuous monitoring for technical debt and security updates is advised.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100 +8Medium25 findingsView report
  2. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  3. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  4. 42/100High22 findingsView report
  5. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  6. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  7. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  8. 61/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipro.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipro.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.