Skip to main content

Security report for ipresso.com

iPresso S.A. · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iPresso S.A. operates a professional Marketing Automation platform targeting businesses and marketers seeking personalized, multi-channel communication solutions. The company offers a broad suite of services including marketing automation scenarios, email marketing, WhatsApp integration, and industry-specific solutions for sectors such as e-commerce, finance, education, and media. Their platform is positioned as a growth enabler with a focus on contextual marketing and customer engagement. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Piwik PRO, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the company demonstrates commitment to data protection through ISO 27001 and GDPR compliance, although some security headers are missing and no explicit incident response contacts are published. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and optimized for performance and mobile use, supporting a strong market presence in the marketing automation industry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipresso.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iPresso holds a solid market position as a B2B SaaS provider specializing in marketing automation with tailored solutions for various industries. Their business model focuses on subscription-based software services complemented by integrations with popular platforms like Google Ads and Zapier. The company targets medium to large enterprises and marketing professionals, leveraging certifications and GDPR compliance as competitive advantages. Their ecosystem includes partnerships and a knowledge-sharing approach via blogs, e-books, and an academy, fostering customer engagement and brand loyalty. The presence of client logos and testimonials further supports credibility and market reach. However, the lack of transparent domain registration data is a minor concern in the context of business intelligence.

Security posture

The security posture of iPresso is generally strong, with HTTPS enforced and adherence to recognized standards such as ISO 27001 and GDPR. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses multiple tracking and marketing scripts responsibly. However, the absence of key security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application against common attacks. The lack of a published security.txt or explicit incident response contact reduces transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional security best practices and improving incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and response.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to ensure compliance with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
iPresso S.A.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iPresso S.A.
Description
Marketing Automation platform that increases sales through multi-channel, personalized communication with customers.
Key services
Marketing Automation Scenarios, E-mail marketing, WhatsApp communication, Feed manager, Recommendation frames, RFM Reports, Abandoned processes management, Integrations with over 20 applications
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Piwik PRO, Microsoft Clarity, LiveChat, Facebook Pixel, Webflow CMS, JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
Webflow, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security certifications
  • Privacy and cookie policies present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Piwik PRO, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Piwik PRO, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
LiveChat, Piwik PRO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on marketing automation with industry-specific solutions.
  3. Multiple certifications and GDPR compliance indicated.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Contact information is comprehensive including email and physical address.
  8. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Mobile and SEO optimizations are well implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack centered around Webflow CMS, supported by a suite of analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Piwik PRO, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The use of asynchronous loading for scripts and optimized images indicates good performance practices. Mobile optimization is excellent, and SEO fundamentals are well addressed through meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting appears to be managed by Webflow, providing reliable infrastructure. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies, but security header implementation is lacking. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable marketing automation platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipresso.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipresso.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.