Skip to main content

Security report for ipjiance.com

Technology · China

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ipjiance.com operates as a specialized IP detection and quality assessment platform primarily targeting cross-border e-commerce and overseas social media users, particularly those engaged with platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube. It offers free IP quality testing tools alongside affiliate recommendations for proxy IP providers, positioning itself as a niche service provider in the proxy and IP quality domain. The business is relatively new, with domain registration dating back to 2022, and is hosted on Alibaba Cloud with Cloudflare DNS services, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure maturity. Technically, the site employs RequireJS and jQuery for frontend modularity and interactivity, with additional libraries like Moment.js for timezone handling. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks visible advanced security headers or HTTPS enforcement details in the provided content. Analytics are implemented via the 51.la SDK, reflecting moderate user tracking practices but with limited privacy compliance as no privacy or cookie policies are present. From a security perspective, the site does not exhibit blocking or WAF mechanisms, allowing full content access. However, the absence of explicit security headers and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in security posture and regulatory compliance. The WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain registration with no privacy protection, consistent with the business timeline and operations. Overall, ipjiance.com presents as a functional and moderately professional service platform with clear business focus but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipjiance.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ipjiance.com occupies a specialized niche in IP quality detection and proxy recommendation services, catering to a targeted audience of cross-border e-commerce operators and social media marketers. Its business model combines free IP testing tools with affiliate marketing partnerships, leveraging a broad ecosystem of proxy providers. The extensive partner links and rotating recommendations indicate a strong affiliate network and monetization strategy. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2022, with no publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary companies. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of multiple proxy service providers, positioning it competitively within the proxy and IP quality assessment market segment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms, allowing open access to content. However, the lack of visible HTTPS enforcement details and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represent vulnerabilities that could expose users to risks like clickjacking or content injection. The site also lacks documented privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other regulatory compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident from the content, the security maturity is moderate and would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS across the entire website with HSTS to ensure secure communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other data protection regulations.
  3. Deploy standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
网站提供IP检测服务,检测IP质量及针对TikTok、Facebook、YouTube等平台的IP环境检测,统计影响IP质量的有效参数,方便外贸电商及海外社交流量用户检测IP。
Key services
IP质量检测, 代理检测, 黑名单检测, 用户特征分析, 时区语言检测
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
RequireJS, jQuery, Moment.js, Moment-Timezone, Cloudflare DNS, 51.la Analytics SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS servers

Analytics and tracking

Services
51.la
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
51.la
Marketing tools
Affiliate banners and rotating recommendations
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides specialized IP detection services targeting cross-border e-commerce and social media users.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Extensive partner and affiliate links to proxy and IP service providers.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via customer service modal with WeChat link.
  5. Uses RequireJS and jQuery for frontend, with Cloudflare DNS and Alibaba Cloud hosting.
  6. No visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers in provided content.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  8. Content is in Simplified Chinese, targeting Chinese-speaking users.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modular JavaScript approach with RequireJS and jQuery, supported by Moment.js libraries for timezone and date handling, indicating a moderately modern frontend stack. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud with DNS managed via Cloudflare, suggesting reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta keywords and description present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears custom-built. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities to improve security headers, privacy compliance, and SEO structured data to enhance overall digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipjiance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipjiance.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.