Skip to main content

Security report for ipaper.io

iPaper · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iPaper is a Denmark-based technology company specializing in digital catalog solutions that transform PDFs into interactive and shareable catalogs. With over 19 years of industry experience, iPaper positions itself as a leading platform focused on driving traffic and online sales for businesses. Their SaaS model targets companies seeking to enhance their digital marketing and sales through innovative catalog presentations. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and social media engagement. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Typekit, and is secured and accelerated via Cloudflare. Analytics are managed through Piwik PRO, complemented by a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent best practices. However, explicit security headers and published security policies are absent, representing areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for commercial entities, though it limits direct verification of domain age and registrant details. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found. Overall, iPaper presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong privacy and compliance measures. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and incident response readiness would further strengthen their posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipaper.io

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iPaper operates in the technology sector, offering a niche SaaS platform for digital catalogs. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing industry experience and focus on interactive PDF catalogs that support business marketing and sales. The business model revolves around subscription-based services targeting B2B clients. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem with integrations such as HubSpot, Intercom, and Typeform, enhancing customer engagement and data collection. Growth indicators include a well-structured website, active social media presence, and comprehensive privacy compliance. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation focused on core catalog services.

Security posture

The security maturity of iPaper's website is moderate to high. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is robust with detailed disclosures about cookies and third-party processors. The use of Cloudflare adds a layer of security and performance optimization. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of publicly available security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and enhancing security headers to mitigate potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Develop and make publicly available a security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and integrations to minimize exposure to vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance trust signals by adding certifications or compliance badges relevant to data protection and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iPaper
Description
iPaper makes it effortless to turn your PDFs into an interactive and shareable digital catalog. With over 19 years working across industries we're focused on driving value for your businesses.
Key services
Digital catalog creation, Interactive PDF conversion, Promotion campaigns with shoppable flipbooks and banners
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts (Inter), Typekit, Cloudflare, Piwik PRO analytics, CookieInformation consent solution, HubSpot (deferred script)
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical and meta tags)
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie info
  • Privacy policy with GDPR compliance
  • Use of Cloudflare for security and performance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO, HubSpot, Intercom
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Typeform, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  3. No terms of service or explicit security policy found
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. Clear business contact information and social media presence
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack centered on Webflow CMS, ensuring ease of content management and responsive design. Integration with Google Fonts and Typekit provides consistent typography. Hosting and security are managed via Cloudflare, which also supports performance optimization. Analytics are handled by Piwik PRO, a privacy-focused platform, complemented by HubSpot and Intercom for marketing and customer engagement. The site loads quickly and is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features. Technical debt appears minimal, though the absence of some security headers suggests room for modernization in security practices. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipaper.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipaper.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.