Skip to main content

Security report for iotrouter.com

IOTRouter Technology CO., LTD · Technology · China

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IOTRouter Technology CO., LTD is a medium-sized Chinese technology company specializing in industrial IoT communication terminals and solutions, including 5G industrial routers, HMI, and edge computing PLC gateways. Founded in 2015, the company positions itself as a leading provider in the industrial IoT sector, targeting enterprise and industrial customers. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, incorporating modern web technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Structured data embedded in the site provides clear business and contact information, enhancing credibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency, which impacts overall trust. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable material. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iotrouter.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on industrial IoT solutions, serving B2B clients requiring advanced communication terminals and edge computing devices. Its market position as a leading provider is supported by a comprehensive product portfolio and professional online presence. The business model centers on direct sales of hardware and integrated solutions. The website's structured data and contact details support business credibility, though the lack of WHOIS transparency suggests a need for further due diligence. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and social media (Facebook) to engage customers. Growth indicators include a modern website and active content updates. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google Tag Manager scripts, indicating basic security and analytics practices. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security maturity.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Chengdu Zongheng Intelligence Control Technology Co., Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IOTRouter Technology CO., LTD
Description
Established in 2015, IOTRouter is a high-tech enterprise specializing in the research and development, production, and sales of industrial IoT communication control terminal products and related overall solutions.
Key services
5G industrial router, HMI, edge computing PLC gateway, IoT Gateway
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, YouTube embed, Premium Addons for Elementor, TranslatePress
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, domain may be unregistered or privacy protected
  3. Professional website with structured data and contact info
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Google Tag Manager
  7. No WAF or blocking detected
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and several premium addons, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, and YouTube embeds provide multimedia content. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and images to improve load times. However, no hosting provider or server details were identified. The technical stack is standard for a professional corporate website but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements to reduce technical debt and operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iotrouter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iotrouter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.