Skip to main content

Security report for invt.io

Gleanin · Technology · United Kingdom

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gleanin is a UK-based technology company providing a community marketing platform designed to help event marketers accelerate word-of-mouth referrals. The website positions Gleanin as a trusted solution used by major event brands, emphasizing its role in unlocking more attendees through community-driven marketing. The business is registered under Level 29 Ltd., founded in 2016, and maintains a professional online presence with clear contact details and client logos showcasing market credibility. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a contemporary and scalable digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a good user experience with consistent branding and clear messaging. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security configurations.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of invt.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching invt.io

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention invt.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for invt.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gleanin operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting event marketing professionals and large event brands. Its SaaS business model focuses on community marketing to drive event attendance through referrals. The company demonstrates strong market positioning by showcasing partnerships with well-known event brands and maintaining a UK-based corporate identity with proper registration and VAT details. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for compliance improvement. The website's clean design and clear call-to-actions indicate a focus on lead generation and product awareness. The LinkedIn presence supports professional networking and brand trust. No affiliate or advertising programs were detected, indicating a direct sales or subscription revenue model.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No forms or input fields were detected on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface but also limiting user interaction data collection. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance risk under GDPR and similar regulations. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing privacy and cookie consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Level 29 Ltd.
VAT number
GB112318363
Registration number
07629794
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gleanin
Description
Gleanin is a community marketing platform that helps event marketers accelerate word-of-mouth referrals for their events.
Key services
Community marketing platform, Word-of-mouth referral acceleration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, AWS DNS hosting
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a marketing landing page for Gleanin platform targeting event marketers.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  3. Contact information includes UK address and phone number with company registration details.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage; no email addresses found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Nuxt.js, Vue.js) and is hosted on AWS DNS.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  9. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn link in footer.
  10. Good branding consistency and professional design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Vue.js, indicating a server-side rendered SPA approach for performance and SEO benefits. Hosting is managed via AWS DNS services, providing reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good user experience. However, no CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Performance is moderate with preloaded scripts and prefetching hints, but no explicit performance metrics were available. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic HTML. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but lacks Open Graph or structured data markup. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with invt.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review invt.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.