Skip to main content

Security report for involve.me

involve.me · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

involve.me is a SaaS platform founded in 2018 and based in Vienna, Austria, specializing in AI-powered lead generation and marketing funnel tools. The company offers a comprehensive suite of interactive tools including funnel generators, landing page builders, quizzes, forms, surveys, and calculators designed to help businesses engage, qualify, and convert leads effectively. The platform targets marketing, sales, and HR teams seeking to automate and optimize their lead capture and qualification processes. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Alpine.js, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and ProfitWell, and is hosted on a performant CDN likely AWS Cloudfront. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile responsive, and accessible, with strong branding consistency and professional content quality. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which is typical for SaaS providers, and does not raise immediate legitimacy concerns given the strong online presence and business information. Overall, involve.me presents as a credible, professional, and technically mature platform with a strong market position in the lead generation technology sector.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of involve.me. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching involve.me

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on SaaS solutions for lead generation and marketing automation. Its business model revolves around subscription-based access to a suite of AI-enhanced funnel and form building tools. The platform supports multiple use cases such as increasing engagement, generating and qualifying leads, recommending products, booking meetings, and selling online. The presence of over 300 templates and AI-driven personalization indicates a scalable and user-friendly approach. The company maintains active social media profiles and has a positive aggregate rating, signaling customer satisfaction and market acceptance. Partnerships and integrations with major platforms enhance its ecosystem. The business targets medium-sized enterprises and marketing professionals, positioning itself as a competitive player in the digital marketing tools market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts requires ongoing vigilance to mitigate privacy and security risks. GDPR compliance indicators are present, supported by privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security governance documents and establishing a formal vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize security risks from external sources.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in privacy documentation.
  5. Consider adding a Data Protection Officer contact or privacy liaison to strengthen GDPR compliance and user confidence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
involve.me
Description
Create high-converting funnels that turn visitors into qualified leads. Boost your lead generation and qualification with interactive, high-converting funnels. Our powerful tools for lead routing, lead scoring and lead capture empower you to seamlessly guide, qualify & convert visitors into valuable leads.
Key services
AI Funnel Generator, Landing Page Builder, Quiz Maker, Form Builder, Survey Maker, Calculator Builder, Lead Routing, Lead Scoring, Lead Capture
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ProfitWell, Cloudfront CDN
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Platforms
AWS Cloudfront
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM), ProfitWell, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo
Marketing tools
ProfitWell
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is rich, professional, and business-oriented
  3. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices
  4. Multiple AI-powered tools and features offered
  5. Good presence of contact information and social media links
  6. No security policy or incident response info publicly available
  7. WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected
  8. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Alpine.js and Font Awesome 6 Pro for UI components and icons. It leverages a CDN (likely AWS Cloudfront) for fast content delivery and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ProfitWell, and PostHog. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical infrastructure supports a fast and reliable user experience with no detected technical debt or legacy technology risks. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation around security and privacy practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium23 findingsView report
  2. 43/100High5 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with involve.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review involve.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.