Skip to main content

Security report for involve.me

involve.me · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

involve.me is a SaaS platform founded in 2018, specializing in AI-powered lead generation and marketing funnel creation tools. The company offers a comprehensive suite of interactive tools including funnel generators, landing page builders, quizzes, surveys, and calculators designed to help businesses engage, qualify, and convert leads effectively. The platform targets marketing, sales, and HR teams seeking to automate and optimize their lead capture and qualification processes. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks, utility-first CSS, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are not evident in the provided content. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, excellent content quality, and strong business credibility, though improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching involve.me

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
45
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself strongly in the competitive SaaS lead generation market by leveraging AI to simplify funnel creation and lead qualification. Its business model is subscription-based with tiered pricing, targeting small to medium businesses. The presence of multiple integrations and a rich template library enhances its competitive advantage. Social proof via reviews and active social media presence supports market credibility. The company is headquartered in Vienna, Austria, and maintains a focused technology stack that supports scalability and performance. The lack of public WHOIS data is typical for SaaS providers and does not detract from legitimacy. Strategic partnerships appear limited to social media and product discovery platforms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and trust in case of security incidents. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security.txt files. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible cookie consent mechanisms or detailed privacy policies in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
involve.me
Description
Create high-converting funnels that turn visitors into qualified leads. Boost your lead generation and qualification with interactive, high-converting funnels. Our powerful tools for lead routing, lead scoring and lead capture empower you to seamlessly guide, qualify & convert visitors into valuable leads.
Key services
AI Funnel Generator, Landing Page Builder, Quiz Maker, Online Form Builder, Survey Maker, Calculator Builder, Lead Routing, Lead Scoring, Lead Capture
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Matomo Analytics, Bing Ads, ProfitWell, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, PostHog
Frameworks
Alpine.js (x-data, x-show directives), Tailwind CSS (utility classes)
Platforms
AWS Cloudfront (cdn), Identity Digital (registry)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM), PostHog, ProfitWell
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, PostHog, ProfitWell
Marketing tools
ProfitWell
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, likely privacy protected
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in provided content
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data
  6. No security policy or incident response information found
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with JavaScript frameworks (Alpine.js), utility-first CSS (Tailwind), and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Matomo, Facebook Pixel, and ProfitWell. Hosting appears to leverage AWS Cloudfront CDN for performance optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is fast with preloading and module preloading techniques. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of CMS identification suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium24 findingsView report
  2. 43/100High5 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with involve.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review involve.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.