Skip to main content

Security report for intesis.com

HMS Networks AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HMS Networks AB operates the Intesis brand, providing advanced network and HVAC gateway solutions that enable smart building integration and automation. The company targets building automation professionals and system integrators, positioning itself as a global leader in industrial communication technology. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design and comprehensive content focused on their core services in building automation and IoT connectivity. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, analytics tools, and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though public security policies and incident response information are not readily available, which could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the overall business credibility remains high based on website content and branding. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies and enhancing accessibility compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intesis.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HMS Networks AB leverages its Intesis brand to serve the building automation sector with network and HVAC gateway products. Their business model is B2B, focusing on integration solutions for smart buildings. The company holds ISO 9001 certification, reinforcing quality assurance. Their market positioning is strong with a global footprint and regional partner sites, such as in China. Revenue streams likely derive from hardware sales, software licenses, and integration services. The website targets technical professionals and decision-makers in building automation, emphasizing product capabilities and interoperability. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides comprehensive legal and privacy documentation, supporting trust and compliance. Partnerships and subsidiaries are clearly indicated, supporting a robust ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, modern security headers, and cookie consent compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security policy and incident response information represents a gap in transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting external reporting channels. The use of reputable analytics and consent tools aligns with GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure process.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards (e.g., WCAG 2.1).
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency around data retention and user privacy practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
HMS Networks AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HMS Networks AB
Description
Connecting smart buildings with Intesis Network and HVAC Gateways allows building devices to communicate with the building automation system.
Key services
Network gateways, HVAC gateways, Building automation integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, VideoJS, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Matomo Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  5. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with moderate user tracking.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  7. Contact information and forms are present and appear legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including VideoJS for media, Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics, Matomo for privacy-focused analytics, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting room for improvement. No CMS was explicitly detected, indicating a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience but could be enhanced with improved accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intesis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intesis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.