Skip to main content

Security report for interux.com

interUX Usability Engineering Studio OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

interUX Usability Engineering Studio OÜ is a small, Estonia-based consultancy specializing in user experience and usability engineering services across Estonia, Latvia, and Russia. With over 20 years of professional expertise, the company offers a comprehensive suite of UX services including user interface design, expert evaluations, field studies, usability testing, and eye tracking. Their client base spans multiple industries such as retail, insurance, travel, and telecommunications, positioning them as a trusted usability partner in the region. Technically, the website employs a basic but functional technology stack consisting of HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and SEO, with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks, indicating a relatively simple infrastructure. From a security perspective, the domain is well-established with a consistent WHOIS record and domain status protections. However, the website lacks critical security headers, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no visible HTTPS enforcement or privacy compliance mechanisms such as privacy or cookie policies. Google Analytics is used without a cookie consent banner, which may raise GDPR compliance concerns. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible business front but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to reduce risk and enhance trust. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, enforcing HTTPS, and providing incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching interux.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

interUX operates as a specialized UX consultancy with a service-based business model targeting organizations in the Baltic and Russian markets. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing expertise and broad industry experience. Revenue streams are likely derived from project-based consulting engagements and usability testing services. The company maintains regional partnerships or localized sites for Russia and Estonia, enhancing market reach. Growth indicators include a diverse client portfolio and a clear focus on usability engineering. The absence of extensive digital marketing or social media presence suggests a traditional consultancy approach relying on reputation and direct client relationships.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, but the website lacks modern security controls such as DNSSEC, security headers, and visible HTTPS enforcement. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate limited compliance maturity. Use of Google Analytics without consent mechanisms may expose the company to GDPR risks. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected, but improvements are needed to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide with a strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  5. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to build trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
interUX Usability Engineering Studio OÜ
Description
User experience consultancy specializing in user interface design and usability engineering for interactive products including desktop and web applications, mobiles, handhelds, ATMs, and touch-screen kiosks. Provides a full range of user-centered design and evaluation services such as expert evaluations, field studies, usability testing, and eye tracking.
Key services
User interface design and prototyping, Expert evaluations, Ethnographic field studies, Competitive analysis, Usability testing, Eye tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics (ga.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with phone and email
  4. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content
  5. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism
  6. No social media links detected in the provided HTML content
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations visible in HTML
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is well established and consistent with business claims
  9. Website targets UX and usability consultancy clients primarily in Estonia, Latvia, and Russia
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, supplemented by Google Analytics for tracking. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks, indicating low technical complexity. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. The lack of modern security headers and DNSSEC suggests technical debt in security infrastructure. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve security configurations, and enhance mobile and accessibility features to improve overall digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with interux.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interux.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.