Skip to main content

Security report for intellistack.com

Intellistack · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Intellistack is a technology company specializing in digital workflow automation solutions, offering a suite of products including forms, document generation, and eSignatures. The company positions itself as a provider of smarter, no-code tools to streamline business processes and enhance digital experiences. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking operational efficiency through automation. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow, Google Tag Manager, and Osano for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy policies in place, though there is room for improvement in explicit security headers and incident response transparency. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, but the association with established brands like Formstack and Formsite supports credibility. Overall, the website is well-designed, compliant with privacy regulations, and provides a trustworthy user experience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of intellistack.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intellistack.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Intellistack operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS solutions for workflow automation and digital transformation. Its business model revolves around providing no-code tools that enable organizations to build forms, automate workflows, and manage digital documents securely. The company leverages partnerships with Formstack, Formsite, and Open Raven to expand its product offerings and market reach. The target customer segments include enterprises and medium to large businesses seeking to reduce operational costs and improve process efficiency. The website's content and external links suggest a strong partnership ecosystem and a strategic focus on integrated digital solutions. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product suite and active social media presence. However, the lack of direct contact information and detailed company background on the site may limit some trust-building opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a visible cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The presence of a dedicated security page indicates awareness of security best practices. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, and no incident response contact information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and handling of security issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to improve transparency and technical defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  2. Add essential security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intellistack
Description
Discover Intellistack's suite of powerful tools for data collection, workflow automation, and seamless digital experiences. Innovate your business today.
Key services
workflow automation, online forms, document generation, eSignatures, digital experience tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Osano Cookie Consent, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Privacy policy linked
  • Security page available

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Osano Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional design with consistent branding
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site
  5. Security page exists but lacks detailed certifications or incident response info
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy questions
  7. Multiple external trusted domains linked (Formstack, Formsite, Open Raven)
  8. Uses modern web technologies and cookie consent management
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies including jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site uses Osano for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no advanced frameworks or backend technologies are explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and enhanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intellistack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intellistack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.