Skip to main content

Security report for intellistack.com

Intellistack · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Intellistack is a technology company specializing in digital workflow automation solutions, offering a suite of products including Intellistack Streamline, Formstack, Formsite, and Open Raven. Their platform focuses on no-code forms, document generation, eSignatures, and contract lifecycle management, targeting businesses seeking to optimize operational efficiency and reduce errors. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, with clear navigation and relevant content aimed at business users. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and GSAP, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Osano for cookie consent. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a dedicated security page and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a mature approach to privacy and security. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trustworthiness but does not negate the professional presentation and security posture observed. Overall, Intellistack's website reflects a credible and established business with a solid technical foundation and good security hygiene, though improvements in transparency and security header implementation are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intellistack.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Intellistack operates in the competitive SaaS market for workflow automation and digital form management. Their integration of multiple products and partnerships with Formstack, Formsite, and Open Raven suggests a strategic ecosystem approach to broaden service offerings. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting enterprises and medium to large businesses seeking to automate data collection and document workflows. The website's content and linked resources indicate a focus on innovation and operational cost reduction, positioning Intellistack as a comprehensive solution provider. Growth indicators include active marketing tools and a dedicated academy for user education. The lack of direct contact details may indicate a preference for controlled lead generation via forms. The partnership ecosystem strengthens market reach and product diversity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent via Osano, and a dedicated security information page. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and no incident response contact information reduces transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and improving incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses on the security page.
  4. Add direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve trust and ease of communication for customers.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations to minimize security risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intellistack
Description
Intellistack offers a suite of powerful tools for data collection, workflow automation, and seamless digital experiences, including no-code forms, documents, eSignatures, contract lifecycle management, and workflows.
Key services
Intellistack Streamline, Formstack, Formsite, Open Raven
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, GSAP ScrollTrigger, Osano Cookie Consent, ChiliPiper Concierge
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Security page linked
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ZoomInfo Websights
Marketing tools
ChiliPiper Concierge
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused and professionally presented.
  3. Multiple integrated products and partner links indicate a mature business ecosystem.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms.
  5. Security and privacy policies are present and linked.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and warrants monitoring.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and GSAP for animations and interactions. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Osano for cookie consent management, reflecting a mature digital marketing and compliance setup. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with external CDN usage for assets. The use of ChiliPiper Concierge indicates advanced lead management capabilities. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical and operational risks. Opportunities exist to enhance security posture and improve transparency around domain registration and contact information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intellistack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intellistack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.