Skip to main content

Security report for inspectlet.com

Inspectlet · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inspectlet is a technology company providing SaaS solutions focused on website visitor session recording, heatmaps, A/B testing, and analytics to help businesses understand user behavior and improve conversion rates. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with a clear value proposition targeting website owners, marketers, and UX professionals. Technically, the site uses modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Segment, along with JavaScript frameworks and libraries like AngularJS and jQuery. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though some accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and asynchronous script loading, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response contact information. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, though the business appears legitimate based on content and customer references. Overall, the site scores well in content quality and technical implementation but should improve privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of inspectlet.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inspectlet.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inspectlet operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider specializing in user behavior analytics. It serves a medium-sized market with over 90,000 customers including notable brands like Shopify, eBay, and Salesforce. The business model is subscription-based, offering tools that enable clients to record visitor sessions, analyze heatmaps, conduct A/B testing, and gather feedback. The company leverages partnerships with analytics platforms such as Google Analytics and Segment. Growth indicators include a strong testimonial base and visible social media engagement. The absence of detailed company registration data limits full business intelligence but the website's professional presentation and client logos suggest a stable market position.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses modern script loading techniques to enhance security and performance. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates a gap in security governance and transparency. Privacy compliance is also insufficient, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no GDPR compliance indicators. These gaps could expose the company to regulatory risks and reduce user trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inspectlet
Description
Inspectlet records videos of your visitors as they use your site, allowing you to see everything they do. See every mouse movement, scroll, click, and keypress on your site. Forget traditional analytics. You never need to wonder how exactly people are using your site again.
Key services
Session Recording, Website Heatmaps, Javascript A/B Testing, Feedback Surveys, Error Logging, Form Analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Segment Analytics, jQuery, Inspectlet JavaScript SDK
Frameworks
AngularJS (ng-controller detected), Pure CSS framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of async and defer on scripts
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Segment
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Segment Analytics
Marketing tools
Segment
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found in provided HTML
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  4. Strong use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of AngularJS and Pure CSS framework, with integration of third-party analytics tools including Google Analytics and Segment. JavaScript libraries such as jQuery are used, and scripts are loaded asynchronously or deferred to optimize performance. The site includes multimedia content like videos and image sliders, enhancing user engagement. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and adaptive layouts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph properties. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100 −10Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 61/100 +9Medium33 findingsView report
  3. 52/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inspectlet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inspectlet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.