Skip to main content

Security report for inspectlet.com

Inspectlet · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inspectlet is a technology company providing advanced website visitor session recording and analytics services. Their platform enables website owners and marketers to understand user behavior through video recordings, heatmaps, A/B testing, feedback surveys, error logging, and form analytics. The company targets digital businesses seeking to optimize user experience and conversion rates. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with multimedia content and customer testimonials from notable companies, indicating a solid market position. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including AngularJS, Pure CSS, Animate.css, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Segment. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well. However, explicit security headers and privacy compliance disclosures are missing, which are important for trust and regulatory adherence. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS usage and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The lack of WHOIS data transparency is a concern, though the website content and external trust signals mitigate this somewhat. Privacy and cookie policies are not evident, which may pose compliance risks. Overall, Inspectlet presents a credible and professional online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inspectlet.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inspectlet operates in the SaaS technology sector, focusing on website analytics and user behavior insights. Their business model revolves around subscription-based services for session recording and related analytics tools. The company serves a broad range of customers including large enterprises and well-known brands, indicating a strong competitive position. Revenue streams likely include tiered subscription plans and enterprise solutions. The presence of partner domains such as docs.inspectlet.com supports a mature ecosystem. Growth indicators include extensive customer testimonials and a demo offering to attract new users. Strategic partnerships with analytics providers like Segment and Google Analytics enhance their market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR and similar frameworks. The lack of explicit security contact channels further weakens the security culture perception. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are detected, improvements in security transparency and compliance are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details if applicable.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update WHOIS information to improve domain registration transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inspectlet
Description
Inspectlet records videos of your visitors as they use your site, allowing you to see everything they do. See every mouse movement, scroll, click, and keypress on your site. Forget traditional analytics. You never need to wonder how exactly people are using your site again.
Key services
Session recording, Website heatmaps, Javascript A/B testing, Feedback surveys, Error logging, Form analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Segment analytics, Inspectlet proprietary scripts, jQuery 1.9.1, Font Awesome icons, Animate.css, Pure CSS framework
Frameworks
AngularJS (ng-controller detected), Pure CSS, Animate.css
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • Use of async and defer on scripts to improve performance
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Segment
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Segment
Marketing tools
Segment
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided HTML
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content
  4. Strong use of session recording and analytics technologies
  5. Good branding and consistent design
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact information
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of AngularJS for frontend control, Pure CSS for layout, and Animate.css for animations, indicating a modern but somewhat legacy frontend stack. Integration with Google Analytics and Segment shows a mature analytics infrastructure. The use of async and defer script loading optimizes performance. However, jQuery 1.9.1 is an outdated library version that may pose security risks and technical debt. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags but lacks advanced accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100 −1Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 62/100 +10Medium32 findingsView report
  3. 52/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inspectlet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inspectlet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.