Skip to main content

Security report for insightech.com

Insightech · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Insightech is a technology company specializing in real-time, unsampled analytics and conversion rate optimization tools designed to improve digital user experiences and drive higher website conversions. The company targets businesses across retail, banking, financial services, insurance, and non-profit sectors, offering a SaaS platform with features such as session replay, clickmaps, and conversion funnel reporting. The website demonstrates a strong market position with notable clients and case studies, reflecting a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and professional content. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform and integrates a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and other marketing and analytics tools. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, providing a fast and accessible user experience. The use of multiple tracking and marketing scripts indicates extensive user behavior tracking. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs some security-related tools like ClickCease for fraud detection. However, explicit security headers are not detected in the provided data, and there is no visible incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but the lack of WHOIS data and some security best practices slightly reduce the trust score. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response transparency are recommended to enhance the security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching insightech.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Insightech operates in the competitive analytics and conversion optimization market, leveraging a SaaS business model focused on delivering actionable insights to improve digital experiences. The company’s client base includes prominent brands in retail, banking, and financial services, indicating strong market penetration and credibility. Their value proposition centers on ease of setup, comprehensive tracking, retroactive insights, and local analyst support, which differentiates them in the market. The presence of multiple case studies and testimonials supports their growth and customer satisfaction. The integration ecosystem with analytics and marketing platforms enhances their product’s versatility and appeal. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and direct contact information may limit transparency for some customers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of anti-fraud tools like ClickCease. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. There is no public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, and incident response contact details are not provided, which could hinder timely communication in case of security incidents. Privacy compliance is partially met with a detailed privacy policy and terms of service, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved with enhanced header configurations, transparency, and compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security email address, to improve communication and trust.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing verified WHOIS data or domain registration details to improve legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Insightech
Description
Insightech provides real-time, unsampled analytics reporting and built-in tools to pinpoint and address website experience friction.
Key services
Real-time analytics, Conversion funnel reporting, Session replay, Clickmaps, Integrations with analytics and marketing tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Reddit Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Webflow CMS, Vidalytics video embed, ClickCease, OutplayHQ, Lftracker, Abtasty, Datacord
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related scripts (ClickCease for fraud detection)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Reddit Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Abtasty
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Quora Pixel, Reddit Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Abtasty, OutplayHQ, Datacord
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered in public WHOIS, which is unusual.
  3. Website uses modern technologies and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main pages.
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  7. Security page exists but lacks detailed framework certifications or incident response contacts.
  8. Multiple trusted client logos and case studies enhance credibility.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; recommend verification.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging a modern and performant infrastructure with extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and others. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured content. Performance is fast with efficient content delivery via CDN. However, the technical stack includes multiple tracking scripts which increase complexity and potential privacy concerns. There is no evidence of server-side security headers in the provided data, which is a technical risk. The absence of WHOIS data suggests possible privacy protection or recent domain registration, which should be monitored for legitimacy. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with insightech.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review insightech.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.