Skip to main content

Security report for inputobjects.eu

Input Objects GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Input Objects GmbH is a small technology company based in Berlin, Germany, specializing in SaaS product development and bespoke software consulting services. Their website presents a professional image with clear branding and a focus on delivering innovative software solutions to business clients. The company emphasizes long-term partnerships and continuous improvement in their offerings. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and PrimeVue, with Tailwind CSS for styling, resulting in a fast and mobile-optimized user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via an external privacy policy, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, suitable for its target audience of businesses seeking software development expertise.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inputobjects.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on software development and consulting. Their business model combines SaaS product offerings with bespoke consulting services, targeting B2B clients globally from their Berlin headquarters and partner offices in London and Madrid. The website content and structure suggest a niche market position with emphasis on privacy-respecting tools and technical leadership. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, likely via contact forms. The partnership ecosystem is hinted at but not detailed. The company appears to maintain a professional and consistent brand image, supporting growth and client trust.

Security posture

Input Objects GmbH demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the website content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could impact client confidence in handling security incidents. The use of third-party analytics without a cookie consent mechanism may present compliance risks under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. The company should consider publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and implementing cookie consent to enhance compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize data exposure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Input Objects GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Input Objects GmbH
Description
Input Objects GmbH is the maker of popular, value-adding SaaS products and offers bespoke software consulting services.
Key services
Product Development, Software Consulting, Full-stack web development, Distributed application and system implementation, Technical leadership
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, PrimeVue, Tailwind CSS, JavaScript, Vue.js
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, PrimeVue
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
WideAngle
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WideAngle (s.inputobjects.eu)
Marketing tools
WideAngle analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on software development and consulting services.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact likely via contact form.
  4. Privacy policy is hosted externally on iubenda, indicating use of third-party privacy compliance tools.
  5. No cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and CSS technologies.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) combined with PrimeVue UI components and Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary and maintainable front-end architecture. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with preloading and module preloading techniques used for assets. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Hosting details are limited but the domain registrar is GANDI, a reputable provider. The technical implementation is robust with no visible errors or broken elements. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility features and SEO metadata further. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inputobjects.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inputobjects.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.