Skip to main content

Security report for inplayer.com

JW Player · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JW Player, operating the InPlayer platform, is a well-established technology company specializing in video monetization solutions including pay per view and OTT live streaming. The company targets content creators, broadcasters, and media companies seeking to monetize video content effectively. The website reflects a mature SaaS business model with a strong market position as a leading paywall and streaming platform provider. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although some security best practices like security headers and public security policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned cookie and privacy policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and business-focused, with no indications of malicious or adult content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inplayer.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JW Player leverages its long domain history and brand recognition to maintain a strong foothold in the video monetization market. The business model centers on SaaS offerings for pay per view and OTT streaming, generating revenue from content owners and distributors. The company maintains a partner ecosystem including Piksel Group for contact and support services. Marketing efforts are supported by extensive use of analytics and retargeting tools, indicating a data-driven growth strategy. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via web forms and partner sites. The company’s digital presence is consistent and professional, supporting its medium-sized enterprise status in the technology sector.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and employs a detailed cookie consent mechanism that supports GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No public security policy or incident response information is available, which could hinder transparency and trust in security matters. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting external security collaboration. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the HTML analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Continue to maintain and update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security culture and compliance posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JW Player
Description
Monetize your videos with InPlayer, the world’s leading pay per view & OTT live streaming platform. Grow your revenue with InPlayer.
Key services
Video monetization, Pay per view, OTT live streaming, Content paywall
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, CookieYes Consent Management, Select2, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot, LinkedIn, Vimeo, YouTube
Marketing tools
Google Optimize, HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and consistent branding aligned with JW Player.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and granular controls.
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicating mature digital marketing.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via web form.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Good SSL/TLS configuration and HTTPS enforced.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Select2 for UI enhancements. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, and HubSpot for marketing and analytics, reflecting a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting is provided via AWS as indicated by DNS servers. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and asynchronous script loading implemented. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. The site uses a cookie consent management platform (CookieYes) for privacy compliance. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding security headers and improving accessibility. The site’s technical infrastructure supports business operations effectively with room for modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inplayer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inplayer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.