Skip to main content

Security report for inksoft.com

InkSoft · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InkSoft operates as a specialized e-commerce platform focused on businesses selling custom branded merchandise, including decorated apparel and promotional products. The company positions itself as a comprehensive solution provider, offering tools from order management to delivery, targeting apparel decorators, promotional product distributors, and print businesses. The website reflects a mature digital presence with extensive resources, customer testimonials, and integration partnerships, indicating a solid market position within its niche. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, SEO-friendly, and integrates marketing and tracking tools such as HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with good accessibility and user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and dedicated security or incident response pages. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain transparency and trust, although the website content and business information appear professional and consistent. Overall, InkSoft presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with room for improvement in security transparency and domain registration clarity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and clarifying domain registration details to improve trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inksoft.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

InkSoft targets a specialized market segment of custom branded merchandise sellers, leveraging a SaaS business model with recurring revenue from platform subscriptions. The company emphasizes growth enablement, operational efficiency, and customer experience enhancement as key value propositions. Partnerships with Printavo and sister company GraphicsFlow expand its ecosystem and service offerings. The presence of marketing kits, podcasts, and customer success stories indicates active engagement with its community and a focus on customer retention. The company appears medium-sized with a founding date around 2013, suggesting stable growth and market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, it lacks several best practice security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were observed. The use of multiple third-party scripts and analytics tools necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced with formal policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to engage with security researchers.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to reduce supply chain risks.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and consider removing privacy protection to enhance domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InkSoft
Description
We make software for businesses selling printed products such as decorated apparel and promotional products. Our mission is to drive your sales growth.
Key services
E-commerce platform, Online stores, Web-to-print designer tool, Art approvals, quotes, invoices, Job and production management, Integration with Printavo
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Remodal, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Forms, AOS (Animate on Scroll), Notify.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Histats, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Ads Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Histats
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms, Apollo.io Website Tracker, CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional e-commerce platform website for custom branded merchandise
  2. Comprehensive marketing and resource content
  3. Multiple contact channels and support resources
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  5. No visible security or content blocking issues
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various UI enhancement libraries such as Slick Carousel and Remodal. It integrates marketing and analytics tools like HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Apollo.io for visitor tracking and lead generation. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and loading speed. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable e-commerce platform but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inksoft.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inksoft.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.