Skip to main content

Security report for infotrack.com

InfoTrack · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InfoTrack is a technology company specializing in integrated eFiling and process serving solutions tailored for modern law firms. Their platform automates key litigation tasks by integrating with popular case management systems such as Clio, Smokeball, LEAP, and Time Matters®. The company positions itself as a leader in legal technology, offering services that streamline court filing, process serving, eSigning, and docket syncing, thereby enhancing operational efficiency for legal teams. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and strong branding consistent with their market positioning. Technically, InfoTrack leverages WordPress with Elementor, integrates Google Tag Manager and Maps APIs, and embeds video content via Wistia, indicating a modern and performant infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although the absence of a dedicated security policy and incident response contact suggests room for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which slightly impacts transparency but is not uncommon for technology firms. Overall, InfoTrack presents a trustworthy and professional online presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infotrack.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

InfoTrack operates in the legal technology sector, targeting law firms and legal professionals seeking to automate and streamline court filing and process serving workflows. Their business model is B2B SaaS, generating revenue through transactional pricing and integration partnerships. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through deep integrations with leading case management systems and a comprehensive service offering that includes eFiling, process serving, eSigning, and docket syncing. Client testimonials and case studies on the website reinforce market credibility and customer satisfaction. The partnership ecosystem includes integration with major legal software providers, enhancing market reach and product stickiness. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with frequent updates and multimedia content. Strategic observations suggest InfoTrack is focused on expanding its integration capabilities and enhancing user experience to maintain leadership in the legal tech space.

Security posture

InfoTrack exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The website does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness communication. No security.txt or dedicated contact channels for security incidents were found. The company should consider publishing these documents and contacts to improve trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by formalizing and publicizing security governance and incident response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing InfoTrack's security practices and commitments.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel, such as security@infotrack.com or abuse@infotrack.com.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program and consider adding a security.txt file to the website root.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing more detailed WHOIS information or justifying privacy protection explicitly.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InfoTrack
Description
InfoTrack integrates with popular case management systems like Clio, Smokeball, LEAP and Time Matters® to automate key court filing tasks.
Key services
eFiling, Process Serving, eSigning, Docket Syncing, Court filing integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Wistia video embed
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and targeted at legal professionals.
  3. Strong integration with legal practice management systems.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML; contact likely via forms.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which is common but reduces transparency.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. Testimonials and client stories enhance trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, indicating a flexible and widely supported platform. It incorporates modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates with Google services including Tag Manager and Maps API for analytics and geolocation features. Video content is embedded using Wistia, enhancing multimedia engagement. The site demonstrates fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness, supported by optimized CSS and lazy loading techniques. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema for enhanced search engine understanding. Accessibility features are present but could be further audited for compliance with standards such as WCAG. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the use of Google services and CDN hints at a robust infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports a high-quality user experience and scalable platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infotrack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infotrack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.