Skip to main content

Security report for infotiv.se

Infotiv · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infotiv is a well-established Swedish technology consultancy firm with over 25 years of experience, specializing in technical information, system architecture, software development, data-driven solutions, testing, mechanics, and project management. The company targets businesses seeking expert technical consultancy and prides itself on delivering smart, secure, and competitive solutions. Their market position is strong, supported by a consistent brand presence and a comprehensive service portfolio. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern tools such as Cookiebot for consent management, Matomo and Hotjar for analytics, and Weglot for multilingual support. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates a robust cookie consent mechanism, ensuring GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers and incident response policies are absent, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the content or scripts. Overall, Infotiv's website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with a solid technical foundation and good privacy practices. Strategic enhancements in security policy transparency and incident response readiness would further strengthen their security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infotiv.se

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infotiv operates in the technology sector as a consultancy and service provider, focusing on engineering and technical information services. Their competitive advantage lies in their 25+ years of experience, broad technical expertise, and a comprehensive service offering that includes software, systems, data, testing, mechanics, and leadership. The business model revolves around consultancy services targeting corporate clients in Sweden, with offices in Göteborg, Malmö, and Södertälje. The company maintains an active presence on major social media platforms, enhancing brand visibility and engagement. Growth indicators include recent news about team activities and project deliveries, suggesting a healthy organizational culture and operational momentum.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management via Cookiebot, and the use of privacy-respecting analytics tools like Matomo. Security best practices such as blocking mode for cookies and clear consent mechanisms are implemented. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site does not provide a security contact or vulnerability disclosure channel, which could enhance incident response readiness and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add explicit security contact channels (e.g., security@infotiv.se) to improve communication in case of incidents.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure they remain up to date and free from vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Infotiv
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infotiv
Description
Infotiv is a technology consultancy company with over 25 years of experience providing technical information, system architecture, software, data-driven development, testing, mechanics, and project management services.
Key services
Teknikinformation, Systemkonstruktion & arkitektur, Mjukvara, Datadriven utveckling, Testsystem och mjukvarutestning, Mekanik, Projektledning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Cookiebot, Matomo Analytics, Hotjar, Weglot translation
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with consent checkboxes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Matomo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Weglot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern CMS (Drupal 10) with good technical implementation.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot with clear categories.
  3. No explicit terms of service found.
  4. Contact information is available via contact page and social media links.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools with consent.
  7. Good mobile and accessibility support.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, indicating a solid technical foundation. Integration of Cookiebot for consent management, Matomo and Hotjar for analytics, and Weglot for multilingual support reflects a mature and privacy-conscious technology stack. The site shows good mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of media and scripts. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found, suggesting further investigation may be needed for infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infotiv.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infotiv.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.