Skip to main content

Security report for infoteam.ch

Infoteam Group · Technology · Switzerland

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infoteam Group is a Swiss-based incubator and group of innovative companies specializing in technology, digitalization, energy, and Industry 4.0 solutions. Established in 1990, it comprises several subsidiaries including Infoteam Digital, Infoteam Automation, and MC-monitoring, serving SMEs and industrial clients in Switzerland and internationally. The website presents a professional and consistent digital presence with clear descriptions of services and expertise areas. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics integrations, offering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though lacking explicit security policies and incident response details. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain transparency and legitimacy, warranting further verification. Overall, the site is credible and professional but could improve privacy and security disclosures to enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infoteam.ch

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Infoteam Group operates as an essential technology entity focusing on digital transformation, Industry 4.0, and energy data management. Its business model revolves around incubating and supporting innovative companies with complementary expertise. The group targets SMEs and industrial clients seeking digitalization and ERP solutions. Market positioning is strong within Switzerland with international reach. The group leverages a partnership ecosystem with clearly linked subsidiary domains. Revenue streams likely include consulting, software solutions, and maintenance services. Growth indicators include recent mergers and active participation in industry events. Strategic observations suggest a focus on sustainable, human-centered technology solutions tailored to future challenges.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by purpose. However, there is no visible security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure information published. Security headers are not explicitly detected, indicating room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and scripts is standard but should be regularly audited. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate readiness and transparency.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infoteam Group
Description
The Infoteam Group brings together innovative Swiss companies and develops its activities in various fields such as energy, digitalization and industry 4.0. It comprises entities including Infoteam Digital, Infoteam Automation, Infoteam Business Solutions SA, IFTG solutions SA and MC-monitoring SA. The group has nearly 100 experts and operates in Switzerland, Europe, and internationally.
Key services
SME digitalisation, Industry 4.0 solutions, Energy data management, ERP project support, Predictive maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Visual Composer Website Builder, Elementor 3.24.7, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, CookieYes consent management
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional and consistent branding and content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories.
  4. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, reducing trust in domain registration transparency.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  6. Contact information including phone and email present but generic email domain used.
  7. Multiple subsidiaries and partner domains linked clearly.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. No security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Visual Composer and Elementor page builders, supported by jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site loads multiple external scripts including LinkedIn Insight and CookieYes for consent management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags implemented. The site uses lazy loading for images and has a responsive design. However, hosting provider details are not evident, and no advanced security headers are detected. The technical stack is standard for corporate websites but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infoteam.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infoteam.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.