Skip to main content

Security report for infogr.am

Infogram · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Infogram is a mature technology company specializing in AI-powered data visualization tools, enabling users worldwide to create interactive infographics, charts, dashboards, and maps. With over 10 million users and a comprehensive SaaS platform, Infogram serves diverse sectors including media, marketing, education, government, and nonprofits. The company emphasizes ease of use, interactivity, and AI-driven recommendations to enhance data storytelling. Technically, Infogram employs a modern React-based single-page application architecture, hosted on AWS infrastructure with robust integrations such as Google Tag Manager, OneTrust for privacy compliance, and Zendesk for customer support. The website demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, Infogram maintains a strong posture with HTTPS enforcement, SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, minor improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing a security.txt file could enhance their security transparency and DNS security. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Infogram presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility, technical sophistication, and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing incident response visibility, expanding security certifications, and improving DNS security to maintain and elevate trust among users and enterprise clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infogr.am

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Infogram holds a solid market position as a leading SaaS provider in the data visualization space, leveraging AI to differentiate its offerings. Its business model focuses on subscription-based services with additional API access for enterprise clients. The platform targets a broad audience including marketers, educators, nonprofits, and government agencies, supported by a rich ecosystem of templates, tutorials, and customer success stories. The company benefits from partnerships with major organizations and maintains a consistent brand presence. Growth indicators include extensive user base and continuous feature enhancements driven by AI and interactivity. Competitive advantages include a comprehensive chart and map library, live data updates, and seamless embedding capabilities. Revenue streams likely derive from tiered subscription plans and API usage. The company’s strategic focus on team collaboration and accessibility positions it well for expanding enterprise adoption.

Security posture

Infogram demonstrates a mature security posture with adherence to SOC 2 Type 2 standards, HTTPS enforcement, and implementation of cookie consent via OneTrust. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap but does not critically impact security. No exposed credentials, vulnerable libraries, or insecure forms were detected. However, the lack of publicly available incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may hinder rapid response to security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy policies and consent mechanisms. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced communication channels for security issues. Overall, Infogram’s security practices align well with industry expectations for SaaS platforms handling user data and interactive content.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Consider obtaining additional security certifications such as ISO 27001 or NIST framework alignment.
  5. Maintain and regularly update cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms to adapt to evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Infogram
Description
Infogram is an easy-to-use, AI-powered tool for creating stunning infographics, charts, dashboards, maps, and more. Effortlessly design and share interactive data visualizations across various platforms.
Key services
Infographic creation, Chart and graph generation, Dashboard building, Map visualizations, Interactive content embedding, AI-powered chart recommendations, API access
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust (cookie consent), Zendesk (support chat), Google Identity Services, AWS DNS hosting
Frameworks
React
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SOC 2 Type 2 compliance
  • Cookie consent with OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of secure external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Marketing tools
OneTrust, Zendesk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered data visualization tools.
  3. Comprehensive navigation with multiple language alternates.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and compliance tools.
  5. SOC 2 Type 2 compliance indicates good security posture.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  7. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust with clear user controls.
  8. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  9. No incident response or security contact information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built as a React single-page application with modern front-end technologies and integrations including Google Tag Manager, OneTrust for privacy, and Zendesk for support. Hosting is managed via AWS DNS services, ensuring scalability and reliability. Performance is optimized with preconnects, async script loading, and responsive design. Accessibility features and SEO meta tags are well implemented. The technical stack reflects a contemporary, well-maintained infrastructure with opportunities for further security enhancements such as DNSSEC and formal vulnerability disclosure processes.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infogr.am. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infogr.am.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.