Skip to main content

Security report for infocert.digital

Tinexta Infocert international website · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tinexta Infocert international website represents a large digital trust services provider and certification authority, positioned as a market leader in digital trust for businesses, professionals, and individuals. The company operates under the Tinexta group and has been established since 2016. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern SEO and page builder tools, targeting an international audience with multilingual support. The technical infrastructure includes AWS DNS hosting and integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching infocert.digital

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a key player in the digital trust and certification authority sector, serving a broad audience including businesses and professionals. Its business model revolves around providing digital trust services such as certification and secure digital transactions. The company benefits from being part of the Tinexta group, enhancing its market credibility. The website's multilingual capabilities and structured data indicate a focus on international markets. The lack of direct contact information on the main site suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly centralized through corporate or partner sites. The use of modern CMS and SEO tools supports ongoing digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain status protections to prevent unauthorized transfers and updates, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of Google reCAPTCHA suggests some protection against automated abuse. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional domain security measures, publishing security policies, and implementing security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Enhance transparency by including verified contact information and data protection officer details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tinexta Infocert international website
Description
Discover the solutions of InfoCert Digital, the largest Certification Authority leader in digital trust services for businesses, professionals and individuals.
Key services
digital trust services, certification authority services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, AWS DNS servers
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital trust service provider site
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page content
  3. Uses modern WordPress CMS with SEO and page builder plugins
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Elementor page builder plugins, indicating a modern and flexible technical stack. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, supported by the DNS servers. The site includes multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with canonical tags, hreflang for multilingual support, and structured JSON-LD data. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to improve resilience against attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with infocert.digital. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review infocert.digital.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.