Skip to main content

Security report for ineight.com

InEight · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InEight is an established enterprise software company specializing in construction project management solutions. The company positions itself as a leader in the construction software market, providing data-driven tools to improve project decision-making. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design and consistent branding. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and optimized with NitroPack, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain protections in place, though there is room for improvement in DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies are found, and no consent mechanisms are implemented. Contact information is not explicitly provided on the homepage, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ineight.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets construction industry professionals and project managers with SaaS-based project management software. Founded in 2002, InEight has a long-standing market presence and positions itself as a market leader. The business model focuses on enterprise software sales and services. The website includes social media engagement across major platforms, indicating active marketing efforts. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests potential gaps in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The technical infrastructure supports good performance and mobile optimization, aligning with enterprise expectations.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with valid SSL and has domain status codes that prevent unauthorized domain changes, indicating good domain security management. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice to prevent DNS spoofing. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager is noted, which requires ongoing monitoring for security risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, DNSSEC, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve web security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InEight
Description
InEight is the leader in construction project management software. Our project management software gives you the data you need to make better decisions.
Key services
construction project management software, data-driven decision support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi theme, NitroPack optimization, Google Tag Manager, Open Sans fonts, FontAwesome icons
Frameworks
Divi, NitroPack
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the HTML content provided.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Social media links are present and consistent with the company brand.
  5. Website uses modern optimization techniques (NitroPack) and a popular CMS (WordPress with Divi).
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the homepage.
  8. No forms with identifiable fields found in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, enhanced with NitroPack for performance optimization. It uses Google Fonts (Open Sans) and FontAwesome icons. Hosting is supported by Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and fast loading times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage schema. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No broken elements or errors were detected in the provided HTML snippet. The technical stack is modern and suitable for enterprise-level websites, though continuous monitoring of third-party scripts and updates is recommended to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ineight.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ineight.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.