Skip to main content

Security report for indra.com

Indra · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Indra is a well-established technology service provider founded in 1994, specializing in app management, secure private cloud, managed hosting, business class connectivity, and co-location services. The company targets businesses requiring reliable and secure digital infrastructure solutions. Their market position is supported by over 25 years of experience and a consistent brand presence. Technically, the website employs legacy but functional technologies such as jQuery 1.11.1 and Font Awesome 4.3.0, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate; while the domain is secured with HTTPS and transfer/update protections, DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or terms of service found. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching indra.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
58
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Indra operates in the technology sector as a small-sized service provider focusing on hosting and cloud infrastructure. Their business model revolves around providing managed IT services and connectivity solutions to businesses, emphasizing reliability and security. The company leverages a long-standing market presence and customer testimonials as trust signals. Their partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are indicated. The website content and structure support clear navigation and service discovery, targeting business clients who require dependable hosting and cloud services.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Indra's website is moderate. The domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited statuses, indicating control over domain changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a notable gap in DNS security. The website lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are best practices to mitigate common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements are recommended to enhance security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Upgrade JavaScript libraries such as jQuery to the latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations like GDPR.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Indra
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Indra
Description
Since 1994, Indra provides app management, secure private cloud, managed hosting, business class connectivity, and co-location services to manage and protect business digital presence.
Key services
App Management, Secure Private Cloud, Managed Hosting, Business Class Connectivity, Co-Location, Support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, jQuery UI 1.11.1, Font Awesome 4.3.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused with clear service offerings and contact information.
  3. No cookie consent or terms of service pages found.
  4. Security headers and DNSSEC are missing, representing moderate security risk.
  5. Social media presence is active on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Google Plus.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is long-established.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery 1.11.1, jQuery UI, Font Awesome 4.3.0, and Google Fonts. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate with full content loading and responsive design elements, though mobile optimization is basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data for website and search action. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses HTTPS, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with indra.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review indra.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.