Skip to main content

Security report for inboxbiz.com

Inbox Business Technologies Limited · Technology · Pakistan

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inbox Business Technologies Limited is a well-established technology solutions provider with over 23 years of experience, specializing in digital transformation, modernization, resilience, and cybersecurity services. The company serves a broad range of enterprise clients, including government entities and major corporations primarily in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Their key offerings include data center infrastructure, enterprise solutions, carrier grade solutions, GRC consulting, data protection, cybersecurity, and network security. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to enterprise customers. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, OwlCarousel, and FontAwesome, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site approach. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and modern libraries but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies, indicating room for improvement in security posture. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site is fully accessible. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business credibility with strong client and partner logos, comprehensive contact information, and a clear business model. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, and implementing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inboxbiz.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inbox holds a strong market position as a technology and consulting firm focused on enterprise digital transformation and resilience. Their competitive advantage lies in a legacy of 23 years, a broad portfolio of services, and partnerships with leading technology providers such as Fortinet, Oracle, Dell, and Palo Alto Networks. The business model is B2B, targeting large enterprises and government sectors, with revenue streams likely from consulting, managed services, and technology implementations. The company shows growth indicators through recent expansions in Riyadh and multiple high-profile projects. The partnership ecosystem is robust, enhancing their service offerings and market reach. Strategic observations include the need to formalize privacy and security policies to align with global compliance standards and to leverage their strong client base for further market penetration.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is moderate. The use of HTTPS and modern libraries is positive, but the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. To enhance security, the company should implement recommended security headers, establish a vulnerability disclosure policy, and ensure secure handling of form inputs. These improvements will reduce risk and demonstrate a stronger security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR and global compliance.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish security.txt or equivalent.
  4. Enhance form security with anti-CSRF tokens and input validation.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Inbox Business Technologies Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inbox Business Technologies Limited
Description
Inbox empowers businesses to modernize and build resilience with agility, enabling them to thrive and stay future-ready in an ever-evolving digital landscape through tailored, innovative, and scalable solutions. They provide modernization, resilience, and agility services including data center infrastructure, enterprise solutions, carrier grade solutions, GRC consulting, data protection, cybersecurity, and network security.
Key services
Data Center Infrastructure, Enterprise Solutions, Carrier Grade Solutions, GRC Consulting, Data Protection, Cybersecurity, Network Security, Consult, Deploy, Operate
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.1, jQuery 3.7.0, OwlCarousel 2.3.4, SweetAlert2, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Fancybox, FontAwesome 6.7.2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (no explicit data but external scripts loaded via HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern libraries and frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and structured content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and libraries.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  7. Strong business presence with multiple offices and notable clients.
  8. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular technology stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, OwlCarousel, SweetAlert2, AOS, and FontAwesome, which supports responsive design and interactive features. The site appears to be custom-built without a common CMS, which can reduce attack surface but requires dedicated maintenance. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed and accessibility improvements. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site is mobile optimized and has clear navigation. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy and security policies, which could impact user trust and regulatory compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inboxbiz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inboxbiz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.