Skip to main content

Security report for impartner.com

Impartner · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Impartner is an established enterprise technology company specializing in partner relationship management (PRM) and channel marketing automation solutions. Their platform is highly rated and trusted by global ecosystem leaders, offering a comprehensive suite of services that cover partner lifecycle management, marketing automation, communications, and analytics. The company targets businesses seeking to optimize and scale their partner ecosystems for revenue growth. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme and integrates multiple modern marketing and analytics tools, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with excellent design and user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and business maturity. Overall, the website reflects a mature, professional enterprise with strong market positioning and digital maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching impartner.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Impartner operates in the technology sector providing SaaS solutions for partner management and channel marketing. Their business model focuses on subscription-based software services targeting medium to large enterprises. The company has a strong market position supported by customer awards and analyst recognition. Their ecosystem includes certified partners and integrations with CRM and marketing platforms. The website content and partner logos indicate a broad and diverse customer base. The company emphasizes ROI-driven partner experiences and automated partner lifecycle management, indicating a focus on measurable business outcomes. Their marketing strategy leverages extensive digital tools and events to engage prospects and customers.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status flags to prevent unauthorized transfers, indicating good baseline security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. The absence of explicit Content Security Policy and other security headers like X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, which could enhance transparency and incident response readiness. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Add explicit security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and X-Frame-Options to harden browser security.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and integrations to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Impartner
Description
Impartner provides partner relationship management software and partner ecosystem management and marketing tools to drive business growth.
Key services
Partner Relationship Management, Through-Channel Marketing Automation, Partner Communications, Partner Lifecycle Management, Pipeline Management, Partner Training & Certification, Market Development Funds, Referral Automation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Sendinblue, Hotjar, ZoomInfo, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Swiper Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Divi Builder
Platforms
AWS (DNS via AWS Route 53)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • No exposed emails or credentials in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from reputable providers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Marketo Munchkin, ZoomInfo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, ZoomInfo
Marketing tools
Marketo, Sendinblue, Qualified
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content.
  2. Strong presence of partner logos and customer testimonials.
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics tools integrated.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  5. Security headers partially implemented; room for improvement.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme and builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. The tech stack includes jQuery, Font Awesome, and various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Hotjar, and ZoomInfo. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS nameservers. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, with some asynchronous script loading to improve speed. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic markup. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with impartner.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review impartner.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.