Gransy, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.
imgbox.com is a well-established free image hosting platform operated by Gransy, s.r.o., a Czech company. The service offers users the ability to upload, host, and share images with a simple and fast interface, supporting JPG, GIF, and PNG formats up to 10MB each. The platform includes features such as gallery creation, thumbnail customization, and comment options, targeting a general audience seeking free image hosting solutions. The website has a consistent brand presence and a moderate market position with millions of hosted files and over 7 years of operational history. Technically, the site uses a combination of jQuery, AngularJS 1.2.0, and Bootstrap frameworks, with Cloudflare DNS and SSL enabled for secure connections. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are employed for user tracking and analytics. While the site performs well and is mobile responsive to a basic degree, the use of an outdated AngularJS version and lack of DNSSEC and security headers present moderate security risks. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and limited privacy compliance features indicate room for improvement in regulatory adherence. From a security perspective, the site benefits from SSL encryption and CSRF token usage in forms, but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and modern security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but the outdated JavaScript framework and missing DNSSEC reduce the overall security posture. The WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting the legitimacy of the domain and business. Overall, imgbox.com is a functional and trustworthy image hosting service with good content quality and technical implementation. However, enhancements in security practices, privacy compliance, and contact transparency are recommended to strengthen user trust and regulatory alignment.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention imgbox.com, from OffSeq Breach.
7 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for imgbox.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with imgbox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imgbox.com.