Skip to main content

Security report for imfirewall.com

南京笨驴信息技术有限公司 · Technology · China

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

南京笨驴信息技术有限公司 operates a Chinese-language website focused on enterprise network security products, specializing in internet behavior management systems and firewalls. The company targets enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions with a portfolio of hardware and software solutions. The website reflects a mature business with a history dating back to 2005 and consistent product updates, positioning it as a specialized player in the Chinese network security market. Technically, the website uses legacy encoding and jQuery-based scripts, hosted on Alibaba Cloud, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate but lacks visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers, indicating room for improvement in web security best practices. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanisms and only a basic privacy policy present. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching imfirewall.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company maintains a focused business model selling proprietary network security hardware and software, supported by consulting and technical services. Its market positioning is that of a specialized domestic Chinese vendor emphasizing independent development and government/enterprise clientele. The product ecosystem includes multiple related domains and partner sites, indicating a modest but coherent partnership network. The company’s revenue streams likely derive from product sales, licensing, and support contracts. The website content and update frequency suggest active business operations and a stable customer base. However, the lack of visible social media presence and limited contact channels may constrain broader market engagement.

Security posture

The website’s security maturity is moderate. While the domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long history, the absence of DNSSEC, HTTPS confirmation, and security headers reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The site does not implement cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms, which may pose compliance risks for international visitors. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Strategic improvements in HTTPS deployment, security headers, and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance where applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
南京笨驴信息技术有限公司
Description
南京笨驴信息技术有限公司是专业的网络安全产品厂商。公司专注于网络信息安全领域产品研发,致力于为企业、政府、学校等单位提供专业的上网行为管理系统软硬件、防火墙系统、网络安全产品、咨询和技术服务。
Key services
上网行为管理系统软硬件, 防火墙系统, 网络安全产品, 咨询和技术服务
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain uses DNSSEC: Not enabled
  • Domain status: ok

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Chinese targeting Chinese enterprises and government sectors.
  2. Content is focused on network security and internet behavior management products.
  3. No privacy or cookie banners detected, indicating limited GDPR compliance.
  4. No visible contact email addresses on main page; phone number provided.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Website uses legacy meta charset gb2312 indicating older encoding standards.
  7. No modern CMS or frameworks detected; uses jQuery and jQuery UI.
  8. No HTTPS or security headers information provided; recommend verification.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with Alibaba Cloud, created in 2005, expires 2026.
  10. No signs of malware, phishing, or adult content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML structure with jQuery and jQuery UI libraries for UI interactions. The charset is gb2312, indicating legacy Chinese encoding rather than UTF-8, which may limit internationalization. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks, suggesting a custom or older platform. Hosting is provided by Alibaba Cloud, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with some mobile optimization but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is basic with meta keywords and descriptions but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. The site navigation is clear but uses older UI patterns. Technical modernization opportunities include updating encoding to UTF-8, adopting responsive design frameworks, and integrating modern SEO and accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with imfirewall.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review imfirewall.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.