Skip to main content

Security report for illow.io

BigID · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BigID is an enterprise-focused technology company specializing in data privacy, security, and compliance automation solutions. Their website prominently features a cookie consent management product designed to help organizations comply with global privacy regulations such as GDPR, CPRA, and LGPD. The company positions itself as a leader in privacy automation with a comprehensive platform that includes AI-powered cookie categorization, dynamic consent banners, and centralized consent management. The website content is professional, well-structured, and supports multiple languages, targeting global enterprises requiring robust privacy compliance tools. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages a modern technology stack including Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot forms, and various marketing and analytics pixels. The site demonstrates excellent SEO, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place, although some security headers are not explicitly detected. The site integrates advanced consent management features aligned with industry standards and frameworks. From a security perspective, the website shows good compliance with privacy regulations and employs secure logging and enforcement mechanisms for cookie consent. However, there is no publicly disclosed formal security policy or incident response information, which could be improved. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the business. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing transparency around security policies and incident response. The website is a trustworthy and professional resource for enterprises seeking privacy compliance solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching illow.io

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention illow.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
145
Employees
0
Customers
145
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for illow.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BigID operates in the competitive data privacy and security technology market, targeting large enterprises and organizations with complex compliance needs. Their business model is SaaS-based, offering modular solutions such as cookie consent management, data discovery, privacy automation, and AI governance. The company has a strong market position supported by industry certifications and a broad partner ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include subscription licenses and professional services. The website indicates a global footprint with offices in multiple countries and multilingual support, reflecting a mature and scalable operation. Strategic partnerships and integrations with major marketing and analytics platforms enhance their competitive advantage. The company’s focus on regulatory compliance and automation positions it well for growth amid increasing global privacy regulations.

Security posture

BigID demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, domain registration protections, and integration of privacy compliance frameworks such as GDPR and CPRA. The cookie consent solution includes secure logging and dynamic enforcement to prevent unauthorized tracking. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing pixels suggests a need for ongoing privacy management vigilance. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced public documentation and security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Implement and disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize privacy risks.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and user privacy controls.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BigID Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BigID
Description
Reduce risk, accelerate time to insight, and get data visibility and control across all your data - everywhere.
Key services
Cookie Consent Management, Data Discovery & Classification, Privacy Automation, Security & Risk Management, AI Governance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Forms, Cloudflare DNS, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, ZoomInfo Pixel, StackAdapt, 6sense, Metadata.io, Navattic
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Cloudflare, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • Consent management with secure logging
  • Support for Global Privacy Control, IAB TCF 2.2, Google Consent Mode v2

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Facebook Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics, ZoomInfo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, ZoomInfo Pixel, Spotify Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Metadata.io, Navattic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on cookie consent and privacy compliance solutions.
  3. Multiple language support and regional customization for compliance.
  4. Extensive use of modern marketing and analytics technologies.
  5. Clear contact information and multiple physical office locations.
  6. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern and well-maintained technology stack including Yoast SEO Premium for SEO optimization, Google Tag Manager for tag management, and HubSpot for form handling. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site loads quickly and is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features. The use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on numerous third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to prevent performance degradation or security issues. The website’s structured data and metadata are well-implemented, supporting SEO and content discoverability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low21 findingsView report
  2. 85/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with illow.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review illow.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.