Skip to main content

Security report for ika.xyz

Ika · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ika is a newly founded technology company specializing in the development of a sub-second Multi-Party Computation (MPC) network designed to scale to 10,000 transactions per second and support hundreds of signer nodes with zero-trust security. Positioned as an innovator in the blockchain and Web3 ecosystem, Ika focuses on enabling multi-chain coordination on the Sui blockchain, targeting Web3 developers, institutional users, and blockchain builders. The company offers key services including scalable MPC infrastructure, cryptographic primitives like dWallet, and interoperability solutions for digital assets across multiple blockchains. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and Cloudflare DNS services. It employs minimal user tracking via Plausible Analytics, ensuring a lightweight and privacy-conscious user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with good performance and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. The domain is very recently registered, consistent with the company's founding year 2024, and uses HTTPS with domain transfer protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and has domain status protections but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. There are no privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting direct communication channels. The site demonstrates trust through partner logos, a whitepaper, and links to Github and documentation, but could improve transparency and compliance. Overall, Ika presents a professional and credible front as a cutting-edge blockchain technology provider. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security policy transparency. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to enhance trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ika.xyz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ika.xyz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
25%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ika.xyz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ika operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on scalable MPC networks for Web3 interoperability and security. Its market positioning is that of a technology innovator with a unique offering of sub-second MPC at scale, targeting developers and institutional users. The business model revolves around providing infrastructure and cryptographic building blocks (dWallet) for decentralized applications and multi-chain coordination. Revenue streams likely include developer tools, partnerships, and possibly enterprise licensing. The company has a strong partnership ecosystem with notable blockchain and investment entities. Growth indicators include recent domain registration, active content updates, and participation in industry events. Strategic observations highlight the importance of compliance and security transparency to support institutional adoption.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear as no security contact channels are published. The security culture appears nascent, typical for a new startup, with room for improvement in transparency and policy publication. Business impact of these gaps includes potential regulatory risk and reduced trust from institutional clients.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Provide clear security incident response contact information and publish a security policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ika
Description
Ika is the first sub-second MPC network, scaling to 10,000 tps and hundreds of signer nodes, with zero-trust security. Powering multi-chain coordination on the Sui blockchain.
Key services
Sub-second Multi-Party Computation (MPC) network, Scalable signing with 10,000 tps and hundreds of signer nodes, Zero-trust security architecture, Multi-chain coordination and interoperability, dWallet cryptographic primitives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Manrope, Merriweather), Cloudflare DNS, Plausible Analytics
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Sui blockchain
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited set
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on advanced blockchain technology and MPC networks.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  5. Security headers and advanced security policies are not explicitly visible.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with minimal tracking.
  7. Strong partner and investor ecosystem indicated by logos and links.
  8. Domain is very new but consistent with business launch timeline.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging Google Fonts and hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. It uses Plausible Analytics for minimal user tracking. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. The domain is newly registered but consistent with the company's launch timeline. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to improve security posture. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. Modern web standards are followed, but accessibility features could be enhanced for broader compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ika.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ika.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.