Skip to main content

Security report for iitee.ee

IITEE OÜ · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IITEE OÜ is an Estonian IT service provider specializing in professional IT solutions for companies, particularly those in the manufacturing sector. Founded in 2006, the company offers IT maintenance, hosting services with high availability, and Office 365 business-class email solutions. Their business model focuses on providing reliable and efficient IT support to improve operational efficiency for their clients. The website reflects a small but professional company with clear contact information and a focus on B2B services. Technically, the website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Google Fonts. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are employed for user tracking and marketing insights. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured, though accessibility features are basic. Hosting appears to be managed by Elkdata OÜ, consistent with the WHOIS data. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is a lack of privacy and cookie policies, which impacts GDPR compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing standard security headers and formal policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with a solid business foundation. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security best practices, which should be addressed to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iitee.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IITEE OÜ occupies a niche position as a regional IT service provider focused on manufacturing companies in Estonia. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized technical support tailored to production enterprises, quick adaptability to client environments, and a comprehensive service offering including IT maintenance, hosting, and Office 365 solutions. Revenue streams likely come from service contracts and hosting fees. The company maintains a small size with a clear local presence and partnerships indicated by displayed partner logos. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and enhancing digital presence. The partnership ecosystem appears limited but focused. Strategic observations suggest a need to improve digital compliance and security posture to maintain competitive advantage and client trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, and avoids exposing sensitive information. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security culture appears basic with room for improvement in formalizing policies and technical defenses. Business impact of current gaps is moderate but could increase with regulatory scrutiny or targeted attacks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to enhance web security.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident response contacts.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance with standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
IITEE OÜ
VAT number
EE101021195
Registration number
11203427
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IITEE OÜ
Description
IITEE OÜ provides professional IT solutions targeted at companies, specializing in IT maintenance, hosting services with 99.9% uptime, and Office 365 business-class email solutions. They focus on supporting manufacturing companies with technical assistance to improve efficiency and work organization.
Key services
IT maintenance, Hosting services, Office 365 solutions, Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Ionicons
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (inferred from URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found on the website.
  2. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with emails, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the website for data collection.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Website content is in Estonian with some English meta tags.
  8. Company targets manufacturing sector with IT services.
  9. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is based on a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and interactive elements like carousels. Google Fonts and Ionicons provide consistent styling and iconography. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. Hosting is managed by Elkdata OÜ, consistent with domain registration data. Performance is moderate with no explicit issues detected. The site lacks a CMS indication, suggesting a custom or static site. Technical debt appears low but could benefit from improved SEO meta tags and accessibility enhancements. No critical technical risks were identified, but security header absence and missing compliance pages represent modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iitee.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iitee.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.