Skip to main content

Security report for idc.net

Internet Data Corporation (IDC) · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Internet Data Corporation (IDC), operating under the brand 后浪云 (IDC.Net), is a US-based technology company specializing in cloud and dedicated server rental services primarily targeting the Hong Kong and US markets. The company offers a broad portfolio including Hong Kong and US cloud servers, dedicated servers across multiple Asia-Pacific locations, virtual hosting, and domain registration services. Their business model focuses on providing high-performance, cost-effective IT infrastructure solutions with flexible payment options including cryptocurrencies. IDC positions itself as a leading global IDC provider with 18 years of industry experience and APNIC+ARIN certifications, aiming to serve enterprises and developers expanding in the Asia-Pacific region. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Flickity, and AOS for animations, alongside integration with Chatwoot for live chat support and Baidu Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. However, some security best practices like HTTP security headers are not visibly implemented, and no explicit SSL/TLS configuration details are available. The site includes cookie consent mechanisms indicating some level of privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site shows moderate maturity with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data for www.idc.net raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration consistency, which impacts trustworthiness. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no certifications are displayed. Customer support is robust with multiple channels including ticketing, Telegram, QQ, and WeChat. Overall, IDC.Net presents a professional and trustworthy front for its IT infrastructure services, but the lack of domain registration transparency and some missing security controls suggest areas for improvement. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain registration, enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving privacy compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching idc.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IDC.Net operates in a competitive cloud and dedicated server market focusing on Hong Kong and US data centers with expansion into Asia-Pacific regions. Their competitive advantages include multi-region server offerings, cryptocurrency payment acceptance, and a strong customer support ecosystem. The business model is subscription-based infrastructure rental with additional domain registration and virtual hosting services. Revenue streams likely derive from monthly and annual server rentals and domain sales. Target customers include SMEs, developers, and enterprises requiring reliable, low-latency servers in Asia-Pacific and US markets. The company maintains partnerships with regional data centers and payment processors, as evidenced by linked partner domains. Growth indicators include diversified product offerings and multi-language site support. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved domain legitimacy and enhanced security posture to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The security posture of IDC.Net is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure programs are found, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of WHOIS domain registration data is a significant concern, potentially impacting trust and domain ownership verification. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The company offers multiple secure payment options and maintains active customer support channels. To improve, IDC.Net should implement comprehensive security headers, publish security and incident response documentation, and verify domain registration details.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and publish accurate WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trust.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent details aligned with GDPR.
  5. Increase transparency by establishing a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Internet Data Corporation (IDC)
Description
后浪云专注于高性能、低价格的香港服务器（BGP/CN2/站群）、香港云服务器、美国服务器、美国云服务器等全球服务器租用服务。APNIC+ARIN双认证，18年行业经验，稳定可靠。
Key services
香港云服务器, 美国云服务器, 独立服务器（香港、美国、日本、韩国、新加坡、菲律宾、台湾、马来西亚）, 虚拟主机, 域名注册
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Flickity, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Swiper, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Chatwoot (live chat), Baidu Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Baidu Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Simplified Chinese
  2. Focus on Hong Kong and US cloud and dedicated servers
  3. Multiple payment options including cryptocurrencies
  4. Multiple customer support channels including live chat, Telegram, QQ, WeChat
  5. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed
  6. No visible email addresses or phone numbers explicitly labeled
  7. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not registered under www.idc.net
  8. Use of modern front-end technologies and analytics
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

IDC.Net's technical infrastructure is built on a modern front-end stack leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Flickity and AOS for interactive UI elements, and Swiper for sliders. The site integrates third-party services such as Chatwoot for live chat and Baidu Analytics for user behavior tracking. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is good with a responsive menu and layout. SEO is supported by meta keywords, descriptions, and structured navigation. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site approach. Hosting provider details are not explicitly stated. Technical risks include missing security headers and unknown SSL configuration, which could affect security and compliance. Opportunities exist to modernize backend infrastructure and improve security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with idc.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review idc.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.