Skip to main content

Security report for icoresolutions.com

iCore – Business integration solutions · Technology · Sweden

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iCore Solutions AB is a Swedish technology company specializing in business integration solutions, offering a leading Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and related professional services. The company targets businesses seeking to automate and integrate critical business processes to improve efficiency, innovation, and ROI. Their market position is strong within the Nordic region, supported by customer testimonials and case studies from notable clients such as Bergans of Norway and Kicks. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and professional branding. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and CookieTractor for cookie consent management, likely powered by Umbraco CMS. The site is mobile-optimized, uses responsive images, and employs HTTPS for secure communications. However, explicit security headers are not evident in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance with a detailed privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a concern, potentially indicating recent registration or privacy protection, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from publishing security policies and incident response contacts. The overall risk assessment is moderate with a recommendation to verify domain registration details and enhance security headers. Strategic improvements in transparency and security documentation will strengthen trust and compliance posture, supporting the company’s professional image and business growth.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icoresolutions.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iCore Solutions AB operates in the technology sector, focusing on integration and automation platforms for business-critical processes. Their business model combines SaaS offerings with professional services including integration, support, and training. The company serves multiple industries such as retail, manufacturing, government, transportation, and real estate, positioning itself as a versatile integration partner. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, consulting fees, and managed services. The presence of multiple customer case studies and partner integrations indicates a healthy ecosystem and growth trajectory. The company leverages digital marketing tools like HubSpot and Google Analytics to engage prospects and optimize conversions. Strategic observations include a strong emphasis on customer success, innovation enablement, and cost savings through automation, which are key competitive advantages in the integration market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. The presence of a SecurityScorecard badge and Bisnode credit rating indicates attention to trust and risk management. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for enhancement. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and may impact incident handling readiness. Overall, the security culture appears positive but would benefit from formalizing security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers to mitigate common web threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Verify and publicly disclose domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  4. Maintain and regularly update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure process.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
iCore Solutions AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iCore – Business integration solutions
Description
Få koll på din data med iCore, den ledande integrationsplattformen för affärskritiska processer. Bli mer anpassningsbar, innovativ och uppnå oöverträffad ROI med våra integrationslösningar.
Key services
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Integration services, Support & Managed services, Training and education
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.1, Google Tag Manager, CookieTractor cookie consent, WebP images, Responsive images
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with detailed cookie descriptions
  • Use of security rating badges (SecurityScorecard)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
HubSpot Meetings
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on integration platform and automation services.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS is used.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which reduces trust score.
  6. Multiple customer case studies and testimonials enhance credibility.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and responsive design.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern technology stack with jQuery 3.6.1, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and CookieTractor for cookie consent management. The use of responsive images and WebP format indicates optimization for performance and mobile devices. The CMS is likely Umbraco, inferred from HTML class names and element identifiers. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts and stylesheets, contributing to moderate performance. Accessibility and SEO best practices are observed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema for the website. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by adding security headers and improving domain registration transparency. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icoresolutions.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icoresolutions.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.