Skip to main content

Security report for iconcept.lv

SIA iConcept · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA iConcept is a Latvian IT company specializing in digital environment solutions tailored to unique business needs. Founded in 2007, it has established a medium-sized presence with projects across 10 countries and a client base of approximately 160 worldwide. Their key services include UX/UI web design, system development, e-commerce platform creation, and mobile application development, leveraging modern technologies such as Laravel, React, Node.js, and Flutter. The company positions itself as a reliable partner focused on usability, performance, and customized solutions. Technically, the website demonstrates a modern tech stack with responsive design, good SEO practices, and integration of analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight, all managed with user consent via Cookiebot. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, there is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. The presence of ISO 9001 certification and client testimonials enhances trustworthiness. Overall, the website and business exhibit a strong professional and secure posture with minor areas for improvement in transparency around security policies and incident response. The lack of WHOIS data limits full domain trust verification but does not detract from the evident legitimacy and quality of the business and its online presence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of iconcept.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iconcept.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SIA iConcept operates in the technology sector as a B2B service provider offering tailored digital solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in a decade-plus experience, a diverse technology stack, and a portfolio of international projects. The business model focuses on custom software development and consulting, targeting enterprises seeking usability-focused IT solutions. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and long-term collaborations. The company demonstrates growth through geographic expansion and a stable client base. Partnerships and funding acknowledgments indicate a supportive ecosystem. Strategic observations highlight a focus on quality, client satisfaction, and continuous innovation.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is good, with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. The use of consent management for cookies and tracking scripts aligns with GDPR compliance. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear adequate but could be enhanced by publishing more explicit security and incident response information. Overall, the security culture is positive but could benefit from formalized documentation and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add an incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) to facilitate reporting.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA iConcept
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA iConcept
Description
Digitālie risinājumi, pielāgoti jūsu biznesa unikālajām vajadzībām. Piedāvā jaunas mājaslapas, interneta veikala izstrādi un esošās vietnes auditu.
Key services
UX/UI web dizains, Sistēmu izstrāde, Interneta veikala izstrāde, Mobilo aplikāciju izstrāde
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Node.js, React Native, Javascript, Laravel, Vue.js, Magento, WooCommerce, Shopify, React, React Native, Flutter, Native
Frameworks
Laravel, Vue.js, React, React Native
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Clear business focus on digital solutions and IT services.
  3. Strong presence of client testimonials and certifications.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No visible security or content blocking issues.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Laravel, Node.js, React, and Vue.js, supporting a responsive and performant user experience. Integration with Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight indicates advanced marketing and analytics capabilities managed with user consent. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags and SEO optimization. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Technical risks are minimal, though ongoing maintenance of third-party dependencies is recommended to avoid vulnerabilities. The site demonstrates technical maturity suitable for a medium-sized IT service provider.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iconcept.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iconcept.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.