Skip to main content

Security report for icomoon.io

Digital Privacy Corporation · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IcoMoon.io is a specialized technology company focused on providing tools for icon management, including importing SVG icons, browsing free icon sets, and generating icon fonts and sprites. Established in 2012 and operated by Digital Privacy Corporation based in the US, the company targets designers and developers seeking efficient icon integration solutions. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with a clear business model combining free offerings and premium plans. Technically, the site uses modern web standards such as HTML5, CSS3, SVG, and JavaScript, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, delivering fast performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking DNSSEC and security headers, and no explicit incident response or security policies are publicly available. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche but could improve security and privacy practices to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of icomoon.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icomoon.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention icomoon.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,345
Employees
0
Customers
5,312
Third parties
33
Weak passwords
13%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for icomoon.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, providing essential design tools for icon management. Its business model includes free access to icon libraries and paid premium plans and icon packs, appealing to a broad audience of digital creators. The website highlights trust from major industry players such as Apple, Microsoft, and Google, reinforcing market credibility. The long domain age and consistent WHOIS data support a stable business presence. However, the lack of direct contact details and limited public security policies suggest areas for operational transparency improvement. The company appears to maintain a lean structure without subsidiaries, focusing on core product offerings and digital distribution.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate; the domain uses clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized transfers, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for security issues. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and minimal privacy compliance indicators highlight potential GDPR compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The website would benefit from implementing DNSSEC, security headers, explicit security policies, and cookie consent to strengthen its security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  5. Provide direct company contact information such as support emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digital Privacy Corporation
Description
Easily manage your icons and integrate them in your projects. Browse free icons or import your own SVG icons to export as icon font, SVG, PNG, sprite and more.
Key services
Icon management, SVG icon import/export, Icon font generation, Icon pack sales, Hosting of SVG and font icons
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, SVG, JavaScript
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie banners detected, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via a form.
  4. No social media links detected in the provided HTML.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  6. Website uses modern HTML5 and SVG technologies with good design and navigation.
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding them.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the business.
  10. Trusted by major companies as per displayed logos, enhancing credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, SVG, and JavaScript, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting is provided via Amazon AWS, indicated by the authoritative nameservers. The site structure is clear with semantic HTML and accessible navigation. However, no CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. SEO is basic with meta description and title tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icomoon.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icomoon.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.