Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention icode1024.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for icode1024.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
爱码网 · Education · China
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
爱码网 is a Chinese-language educational website founded in 2023 that provides free downloadable programming tutorials, source code templates, books, video courses, and other learning resources. It targets programmers, students, and developers seeking accessible and high-quality programming materials. The website operates on the Z-BlogPHP CMS platform and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Prism.js for enhanced user experience. It is positioned as a niche resource provider in the education and technology sectors within China, with a small business size and a focus on free content sharing. The site includes ICP and public security filings, indicating regulatory compliance in China. Technically, the website demonstrates moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, it lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for improved security posture. The site uses HTTPS but does not display explicit privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. User tracking is performed via Baidu Analytics, reflecting moderate user tracking levels. From a security perspective, the site shows basic security hygiene but lacks comprehensive security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The contact email is a generic QQ address rather than a company domain email, which may affect business credibility. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, with no suspicious WHOIS patterns detected. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to enhance security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, enable DNSSEC, and improve contact information transparency to strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention icode1024.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for icode1024.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with icode1024.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icode1024.com.