Skip to main content

Security report for icn.global

Impossible Cloud Network · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized cloud platform focused on providing secure, permissionless cloud services tailored for AI, gaming, and next-generation applications. The platform integrates decentralized storage, compute, and networking into a unified infrastructure, enabling enterprises and developers to build scalable, censorship-resistant cloud solutions. Backed by top-tier venture capital including Nokia-backed NGP Capital, ICN has a live mainnet and real-world adoption with over 1,000 enterprise clients and significant annual recurring revenue. Technically, ICN leverages a modern web stack including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. The platform emphasizes performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, with a well-structured website providing comprehensive documentation, FAQs, and roadmap details. The decentralized architecture is supported by two core node types, HyperNodes and ScalerNodes, incentivized through token staking and rewards. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses consent management tools, but lacks explicit security headers and published vulnerability disclosure policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Privacy protection is applied to WHOIS data, which is common and justified for this technology sector. Overall, ICN presents a strong business and technical profile with a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and providing clearer incident response contacts to further strengthen security posture and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of icn.global. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 14 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icn.global

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention icn.global, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for icn.global right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ICN is positioned as a next-generation decentralized cloud infrastructure provider targeting enterprises, developers, and node operators. Its competitive advantages include a composable, permissionless cloud integrating storage, compute, and networking, backed by a token economy incentivizing network participation. Revenue streams derive from enterprise clients and token staking mechanisms. The company has established partnerships with major VCs and exchanges, indicating strong market validation. The platform's roadmap shows progressive decentralization and ecosystem expansion, signaling growth potential. ICN's business model leverages blockchain technology to disrupt traditional cloud monopolies, appealing to Web3 and AI sectors.

Security posture

The security maturity of ICN's website is moderate to high. HTTPS is enforced, and privacy compliance is supported by Cookiebot consent management. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not visibly configured, representing an area for improvement. No direct incident response or security contact information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is found. The platform's decentralized architecture and node monitoring mechanisms suggest a robust underlying security model, but public-facing security transparency could be enhanced to build greater trust and compliance assurance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Enhance transparency around data protection officer and security governance.
  5. Continue to monitor and audit third-party scripts and integrations for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Impossible Cloud Network
Description
ICN is a decentralized cloud platform providing secure, permissionless services for AI, gaming, and next-gen applications. It offers a decentralized cloud infrastructure integrating storage, compute, and networking at scale, targeting enterprises and developers with a Web3-enabled cloud solution.
Key services
Decentralized storage, Compute services, Networking, Node operation (HyperNodes and ScalerNodes), Token staking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Swiper.js, GSAP (TweenMax), HubSpot forms
Frameworks
Webflow, Google Analytics ecosystem
Platforms
Web, Blockchain (Ethereum, Base Layer)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of consent management (Cookiebot)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Markfi Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
blockchain-ads.com
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Strong emphasis on decentralized cloud technology and blockchain integration
  3. Multiple external integrations with analytics and consent management
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security flaws in HTML
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed
  7. Presence of a detailed FAQ and roadmap indicating maturity
  8. Use of modern web technologies and good SEO practices
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, performant technology stack primarily using Webflow CMS, integrated with Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast with efficient use of CDN-hosted assets. The use of HubSpot forms indicates professional data collection practices. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible outdated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security header implementation and incident response readiness to reduce potential attack surface and enhance trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icn.global. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icn.global.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.