Skip to main content

Security report for icn.global

Impossible Cloud Network · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Impossible Cloud Network (ICN) is a decentralized cloud platform specializing in secure, permissionless services tailored for AI, gaming, and next-generation applications. The company positions itself as an emerging player in the decentralized cloud technology sector, targeting developers and businesses requiring scalable and secure cloud infrastructure. The website content is professionally designed and consistent with the company's technological focus, although explicit business founding details and contact information are not publicly available. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. Hosting appears to be supported by Cloudflare services, enhancing performance and security. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, reflecting a commitment to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, which is typical for technology startups but limits full domain trust assessment. Overall, ICN's website reflects a solid technical foundation and a professional business presence in the decentralized cloud space. However, improvements in transparency, including publishing privacy policies, contact details, and security policies, would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icn.global

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention icn.global, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for icn.global right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ICN operates in the decentralized cloud computing sector, focusing on AI and gaming applications, which are high-growth technology markets. The business model centers on providing secure, permissionless cloud services, likely generating revenue through platform usage or service subscriptions. The company targets developers and enterprises seeking decentralized infrastructure solutions. The presence of advanced analytics and marketing tools indicates active user engagement and growth strategies. Lack of explicit company registration or contact details suggests a startup or early-stage company. The ecosystem includes partnerships with analytics and advertising providers but no direct business partners or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but no explicit privacy policy was found. The site lacks a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public-facing technology platform but could be strengthened by adopting best practices and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked from the website footer or header.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including general, support, and security incident response emails or forms.
  4. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with evolving regulations like GDPR and NIS2.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Impossible Cloud Network
Description
ICN is a decentralized cloud platform providing secure, permission less services for AI, gaming, and next-gen applications.
Key services
decentralized cloud platform, secure permissionless services, AI application hosting, gaming application hosting, next-generation application support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot, Cloudflare (inferred from cookies and scripts), Markfi analytics
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Markfi Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Twitter, Bitmedia
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Twitter tracking pixels
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No direct contact information or privacy policy page found in provided content
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information
  7. Website content is focused on decentralized cloud services for AI and gaming
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. Hosting is likely via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site loads moderately fast with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a technology startup, though there is room for improvement in security header implementation and accessibility enhancements. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icn.global. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icn.global.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.