Skip to main content

Security report for icecube2.net

IceCube.Net · Technology · Switzerland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IceCube.Net is a Swiss-based software company specializing in an enterprise content management system named IceCube2.Net. The website presents a professional image targeting enterprise customers who require efficient content management with features like inline editing. The company has been established since 2010, aligning with the domain registration date, and positions itself as a niche player in the CMS market. The website content is clear, relevant, and well-structured, supporting a good user experience and moderate mobile optimization. Technically, the site leverages ASP.NET technology with integrations of modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and VideoJS, alongside marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics and AutopilotHQ. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Cloudflare, ensuring good SSL configuration and performance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers are detected, indicating room for security improvements. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect form submissions, but lacks published privacy and cookie policies, which impacts GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided, limiting direct communication channels. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website scores moderately well in content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility but falls short in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic improvements in policy transparency, security headers, and contact information would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icecube2.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IceCube.Net operates in the technology sector, focusing on enterprise content management software. Its competitive advantage lies in its Swiss origin and specialized inline editing feature, catering to enterprise clients seeking streamlined content management solutions. The business model revolves around software licensing or subscription, targeting medium to large enterprises. The company appears small but established, with a stable domain and consistent branding. Marketing efforts include digital tracking and lead capture via subscription forms. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. Growth indicators are limited but the niche focus suggests a specialized market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented to mitigate spam and abuse on forms. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain ownership protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also exposes the company to compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but requires enhancements to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve communication and credibility.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contacts to foster security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IceCube.Net
Description
IceCube.Net est une société éditrice du logiciel du même nom, un CMS entièrement conçu par une société suisse. Le logiciel est orienté « entreprise » (système de gestion de contenu d’entreprise). IceCube.Net permet de gérer facilement le contenu d’un site Internet grâce notamment à la fonction d’ « Inline Editing ». L’utilisateur peut ainsi éditer du contenu directement dans la page sans utiliser une interface d’administration dédiée.
Key services
Enterprise Content Management System, Inline Editing feature
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, VideoJS, AutopilotHQ
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration on forms
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HitTail
Marketing tools
AutopilotHQ
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional business site for a Swiss enterprise CMS software.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Uses modern tracking and marketing tools but lacks transparency on data retention.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed; only a subscription form is present.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security shortfall.
  7. Good use of HTTPS and reCAPTCHA for form security.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET technology with client-side enhancements using jQuery and VideoJS for multimedia content. It integrates Google Analytics for traffic analysis and AutopilotHQ for marketing automation. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing SSL termination and CDN services. The site loads moderately fast with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags supporting SEO. The subscription form uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent spam. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in security practices and enhanced mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icecube2.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icecube2.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.