Skip to main content

Security report for icecast.org

Xiph.Org · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Icecast.org is the official website for Icecast, an open source streaming media server software developed and maintained by the Xiph.Org Foundation. The site provides information about the software, its capabilities supporting multiple audio and video codecs, and related projects under the Xiph.Org umbrella. The business model is centered on open source distribution under the GNU GPL v2 license, targeting developers, broadcasters, and multimedia enthusiasts who require versatile streaming solutions. The website content is relevant and professional, though basic in design and lacking in comprehensive privacy or security policies. From a technical perspective, the website uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with no detected advanced frameworks or CMS. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO features. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected, indicating a privacy-respecting approach but also limited marketing capabilities. Security posture is moderate; the domain is secured with clientTransferProhibited status and uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL), but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no contact information is provided for security incidents or general inquiries, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and legitimate, supported by consistent WHOIS data showing long domain age and clear registrant information. However, improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and user engagement through contact channels are recommended to strengthen the site’s professional and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icecast.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Icecast.org operates within the technology sector as a provider of open source streaming media server software. Its market position is that of a niche but established player in internet radio and multimedia streaming, supported by the Xiph.Org Foundation. The business model relies on open source licensing and community contributions rather than direct revenue streams. The target audience includes developers, broadcasters, and streaming media users seeking flexible and standards-compliant streaming solutions. The ecosystem includes related projects such as Opus, FLAC, Vorbis, and Theora, indicating a strong partnership network within open source multimedia codecs. Growth indicators include ongoing software releases and updates, though the website lacks commercial marketing or monetization features. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing user engagement, security transparency, and compliance to support broader adoption and trust.

Security posture

The security maturity level of icecast.org is moderate. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers and uses HTTPS, but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no incident response or security contact information is provided, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and best practices. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of analytics and tracking reduces privacy risks but also limits visibility into user behavior. Overall, the site demonstrates a basic security culture but would benefit from formalizing security policies, improving technical controls, and publishing clear incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse email addresses to facilitate incident reporting and response.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user engagement and improve the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Xiph.Org
Description
Icecast is free server software for streaming multimedia supporting Ogg (Vorbis and Theora), Opus, WebM and MP3 streams. It can be used to create Internet radio stations or private jukeboxes and supports open standards.
Key services
Streaming media server software, Support for multiple audio/video codecs, Downloads of related libraries (libigloo, libshout)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Content is focused on open source streaming software
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. WHOIS data shows long domain age and consistent registrant info
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML5 and CSS3 without detectable advanced frameworks or CMS. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced accessibility features. No JavaScript libraries or analytics scripts were detected, indicating minimal technical complexity and low tracking. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The domain uses clientTransferProhibited status but does not have DNSSEC enabled, representing a technical security gap. The website’s canonical URL uses HTTP, but the presence of HTTPS is implied though not explicitly confirmed in the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icecast.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icecast.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.