Skip to main content

Security report for icagile.com

ICAgile · Education · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ICAgile is a globally recognized accreditation body specializing in agile education and certification. The organization offers a comprehensive catalog of agile certifications and micro-credentials tailored for individuals and organizations seeking to advance their agile capabilities. With over 300,000 certifications awarded and backing from more than 50 industry thought leaders, ICAgile holds a strong market position in the agile education sector. The website reflects a professional and user-friendly design, targeting both individual learners and enterprise clients with clear calls to action and resources. Technically, the website leverages modern marketing and analytics technologies including HubSpot, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Mailchimp, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with proper use of meta tags and structured data. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although some security headers are not explicitly detected. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are published, relying instead on contact forms. The WHOIS data is unavailable or not publicly accessible, which limits transparency regarding domain registration details. Despite this, the website's professional appearance, extensive content, and strong trust indicators suggest legitimacy. Privacy policies and cookie consent are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. No security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found, representing an area for potential improvement. Overall, ICAgile's website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, technical maturity, and business credibility, with minor gaps in domain transparency and published security policies. The risk profile is low, and the site is suitable for its educational and certification purposes.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching icagile.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ICAgile operates as an essential entity in the education and technology sectors, focusing on agile certification and training. Its business model centers on accreditation and certification services, targeting individual professionals and enterprise organizations globally. The company benefits from a strong reputation, evidenced by high recommendation rates and extensive certification issuance. Revenue streams likely include certification fees, enterprise memberships, and training partnerships. The organization maintains an active presence on major social media platforms and integrates advanced marketing tools to engage its audience. Growth indicators include the introduction of new micro-credentials and expanding enterprise solutions. ICAgile's partnership ecosystem includes recognized industry leaders and training providers, enhancing its market reach and credibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and implementation of cookie consent mechanisms aligned with privacy regulations. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain registration transparency, which is a minor concern. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in published policies and header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available or providing registrant information on the website.
  5. Maintain and regularly review privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ICAgile
Description
ICAgile offers a comprehensive agile certification catalog for individuals or organizations, setting a globally recognized standard for agile education.
Key services
Agile certification programs, Micro-credentials, Enterprise membership and solutions, Learning programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot, Google Analytics, Hotjar, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Mailchimp
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at agile certification
  3. Strong use of marketing and analytics tools with privacy compliance
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact forms
  5. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain registration transparency
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented properly
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with HubSpot for marketing automation, Google Analytics for traffic analysis, Hotjar for user behavior insights, and Mailchimp for email marketing. The site is built with responsive design principles, ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted libraries like jQuery. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available from the data. The site uses multiple third-party integrations for analytics and marketing, which are well managed with consent mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with icagile.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review icagile.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.