Skip to main content

Security report for i-host.pl

i-host · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

i-host.pl is a Polish technology company specializing in providing tailored hosting services, domain registration, website creation, and security solutions for businesses. The company emphasizes personalized customer support and offers a range of hosting packages to meet diverse client needs. Their market position is that of a reliable small-sized hosting provider focused on the Polish market. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager with consent management, and uses Socket.io for chat functionality. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, providing a good user experience. Security-wise, while HTTPS is implied, explicit security headers and policies are not evident, and no incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data from the official .pl registry is a concern but the website's professionalism and transparency mitigate some risk. Overall, the site is trustworthy with moderate technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching i-host.pl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the competitive Polish hosting and domain registration market, targeting small to medium businesses seeking reliable and customizable hosting solutions. Their business model includes direct sales of hosting packages, domain registration, and website development services, supported by expert consultations. Customer testimonials and clear contact information enhance credibility. The use of modern analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement. The lack of WHOIS transparency may affect trust among some clients, but the company's visible professionalism and service offerings suggest stable operations. Growth potential exists through expanded service offerings and enhanced security certifications.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, X-Frame-Options), lack of published security policies, and no incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Socket.io requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR is supported by privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business size but could be enhanced with formalized policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider obtaining recognized security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001) to strengthen market trust and compliance posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
i-host
Description
Firma oferuje hosting dopasowany do potrzeb klientów, rejestrację domen, tworzenie stron WWW oraz usługi związane z bezpieczeństwem stron internetowych. Zapewnia indywidualną obsługę klienta i wsparcie techniczne.
Key services
hosting, rejestracja domen, tworzenie stron WWW, bezpieczeństwo stron internetowych
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Socket.io, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Google Tag Manager with consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a .pl domain.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms present.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided and consistent.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Use of modern analytics and tag management tools with consent management.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Socket.io for real-time chat. The front-end is built with responsive design principles, likely leveraging Bootstrap or similar CSS frameworks. Performance is moderate with preloading of key assets. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of visible security headers. Opportunities exist to improve performance optimization and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with i-host.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review i-host.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.