Skip to main content

Security report for hyperops.net

HyperOps UAB · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HyperOps UAB is a Lithuania-based managed hosting and systems management provider specializing in high-end, critical application hosting with 24x7x365 support. The company targets enterprises and startups in sectors such as finance, telecommunications, media, and technology, offering services including DevOps as a service, end-to-end systems management, cloud and physical hosting, security consulting, and performance tuning. Their market position is supported by over a decade of experience and client testimonials from European and international customers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins like Elementor and Revolution Slider, integrating analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Tawk.to chat. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and GDPR compliance with a cookie consent mechanism. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies is a gap. WHOIS data is missing or privacy protected, which reduces transparency and slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, HyperOps presents a professional and credible online presence with solid business and technical foundations. Strategic improvements in security transparency and WHOIS data clarity would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hyperops.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HyperOps operates in a competitive managed hosting market, focusing on high-availability and security-critical clients such as financial institutions and telecoms. Their business model centers on providing comprehensive managed services with strong SLAs and rapid incident response. The company leverages a global datacenter footprint with locations in Europe and the US, enhancing their market reach. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media presence but no explicit partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include long-term client relationships and active engagement channels. Revenue streams likely derive from managed hosting contracts, consulting, and a la carte services. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality and reliability to differentiate from commoditized hosting providers.

Security posture

HyperOps demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of security and monitoring plugins indicates proactive operational security. However, the lack of published incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and may hinder rapid external reporting of security issues. No security certifications were found on the site. The absence of HTTP security headers is a technical gap that could be addressed to improve defense-in-depth. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced communication and formalized disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and abuse contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
HyperOps UAB
VAT number
LT100001162913
Registration number
300044099
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HyperOps UAB
Description
Complete system and application management solutions 24x7x365. Industry-leading incident response times. High-end managed hosting. High availability ops.
Key services
DevOps as a service, End-to-End Systems Management, Managed Hosting (Virtual Machines, Physical Machines, Cloud, On-Premise, Hybrid Cloud), Security Testing and Consulting, Application Performance Tuning, Off-Site Data Backups, Monitoring and Incident Response
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8, Elementor, Revolution Slider, jQuery 3.6.0, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Tawk.to chat, Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and monitoring plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Tawk.to chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and comprehensive service descriptions
  2. Strong focus on managed hosting and systems management for critical applications
  3. Good GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms
  4. Active customer engagement via chat and phone support
  5. WHOIS data missing or privacy protected, which reduces transparency
  6. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins for page building (Elementor) and sliders (Revolution Slider). It integrates analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager and Hotjar, and provides live chat via Tawk.to. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with Yoast SEO. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The absence of HTTP security headers and incomplete WHOIS data are technical risks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be enhanced with improved security configurations and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hyperops.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hyperops.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.