Skip to main content

Security report for hyperledger.org

LF Decentralized Trust · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LF Decentralized Trust is an open source foundation dedicated to fostering decentralized technologies and ecosystems. It serves a global community of technology leaders, enterprises, and service providers focused on building a decentralized future. The organization is positioned as a premier open source foundation with a strong membership base including major industry players such as Accenture, Citi, IBM, and Siemens. Their key services include collaborative development, hosting projects and labs, membership engagement, and training. Technically, the website is built on HubSpot CMS with modern web technologies and integrates analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and a public security bug reporting channel, though privacy compliance could be improved with a more comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, reflecting a mature and credible organization in the technology sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hyperledger.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
35
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the technology sector with a focus on decentralized trust and blockchain-related technologies. Its business model revolves around open source collaboration and ecosystem development, targeting enterprises, governments, and developers. The presence of high-profile members and partners indicates strong market positioning and influence. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, training, certifications, and vendor services. The organization maintains active communication channels including blogs, webinars, and events, supporting community growth and engagement. Strategic partnerships with Hyperledger and other technology leaders enhance its competitive advantage and innovation capacity.

Security posture

LF Decentralized Trust demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and a dedicated vulnerability disclosure program via HackerOne. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the absence of a visible cookie consent banner and a detailed privacy policy may present compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. Incident response readiness is implied through the security bug reporting channel but lacks explicit public documentation. Overall, the security culture appears proactive and aligned with industry best practices, though improvements in privacy transparency and accessibility are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to enhance user privacy compliance and transparency.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing GDPR and other relevant data protection regulations.
  3. Add explicit security policy and incident response information accessible to users and partners.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security posture.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LF Decentralized Trust
Description
LF Decentralized Trust is a global community of tech leaders, service providers, and forward-looking enterprises working together to build a decentralized future. It is the premier open source foundation for collaborative development of technologies and standards that deliver transparency, reliability, security, and efficiency for a digital-first economy.
Key services
Collaborative development of decentralized technologies, Hosting projects and labs, Membership and community engagement, Training and certifications, Vendor and service provider directories
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Magnific Popup, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security bug reporting platform (HackerOne)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong presence of reputable industry members and partners.
  3. No WHOIS data available, likely due to privacy protection or query failure.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms and external platforms.
  5. Security best practices are followed with HTTPS and security headers.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected, which may impact privacy compliance.
  7. Active blog and news sections indicate ongoing activity.
  8. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing tools is evident.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and HubSpot Analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good performance and SEO optimization. Hosting appears stable and professional, likely managed by the Linux Foundation or HubSpot. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible outdated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hyperledger.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hyperledger.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.