Skip to main content

Security report for hyperia.sk

Hyperia · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hyperia is a Slovak technology company specializing in the creation and operation of proprietary online projects with a presence in approximately 40 countries. Their portfolio includes projects such as Kimbino, TasteList, Pohodo, and LeadGen, indicating a focus on digital services and lead generation. The company targets businesses and users interested in innovative online solutions, leveraging their freedom in project creation, financing, and planning to maintain a competitive market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing modern plugins like Yoast SEO Premium, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security-wise, the site benefits from HTTPS encryption and bot protection via reCAPTCHA but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which are recommended for improved posture. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through a cookie consent mechanism, but no explicit privacy or terms of service policies were found in the provided content. Overall, Hyperia presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hyperia.sk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hyperia operates in the technology sector with a medium-sized footprint, focusing on proprietary online projects that serve a global audience. Their business model revolves around developing and managing digital platforms that generate leads and provide online services. The company leverages a strong social media presence across LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube to engage with its audience and enhance brand visibility. The use of advanced SEO and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to market positioning and customer acquisition. While no direct information on revenue streams or partnerships was found, the presence of multiple online projects indicates diversified digital assets. The absence of explicit contact information and detailed corporate data on the website suggests a potential area for transparency enhancement to build further trust with stakeholders.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces the defense-in-depth posture. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and remediation of security issues. The use of reputable plugins and a modern CMS platform reduces the risk of known vulnerabilities, but continuous monitoring and updates are essential. Privacy compliance is partially implemented with cookie consent, yet the lack of a visible privacy policy and terms of service may expose the company to regulatory scrutiny. Overall, the security posture is good but would benefit from enhanced transparency, documented policies, and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hyperia
Description
Hyperia tvorí vlastné online projekty, s ktorými pôsobíme až v 40 krajinách sveta. Máme voľnosť pri ich tvorbe, financovaní i plánovaní.
Key services
Online projects development, Kimbino, TasteList, Pohodo, Lead Generation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Select2, PixelYourSite PRO, Salient Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Use of security and analytics plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PixelYourSite PRO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page content.
  3. Cookie policy is implemented with consent mechanism via Complianz GDPR Premium plugin.
  4. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers is not explicitly present in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with popular SEO and analytics plugins.
  7. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Content is professional, business-focused, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Salient theme and integrates several modern technologies including Yoast SEO Premium for search engine optimization, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The CSS and JavaScript assets are well-organized, and fonts are preloaded for performance optimization. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and uses structured data (JSON-LD) to enhance search engine understanding. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and performance is moderate, suggesting potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, indicating room for improvement to meet higher standards. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hyperia.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hyperia.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.