Skip to main content

Security report for hyperbridge.network

Hyperbridge · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hyperbridge is a technology company focused on providing cryptographically secure interoperability solutions for blockchain networks. Their platform offers developer tools such as the ISMP SDK, token gateways, and permissionless relayers, positioning themselves as a secure coprocessor for interoperability in the blockchain ecosystem. The website is professionally designed using modern JavaScript frameworks, notably Nuxt.js, and includes integrations with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The content is targeted primarily at developers and blockchain technology users seeking secure interoperability solutions. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for tech startups, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional technology business with moderate risk due to limited public compliance disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hyperbridge.network

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hyperbridge operates in the blockchain interoperability sector, offering a suite of products aimed at enhancing secure communication across multiple blockchain networks. Their business model revolves around providing developer-centric tools and infrastructure components that facilitate permissionless relaying and token bridging. The company leverages partnerships with research entities such as Polytope Labs, as indicated by linked domains. The market positioning is that of a niche technology provider with a focus on security and cryptographic proofs. Revenue streams likely include platform usage fees or token-related services. The target customers are blockchain developers and enterprises requiring secure interoperability. Growth indicators include active developer resources and a roadmap section on the website. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and demonstrates technical maturity through its web infrastructure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which may lead to compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no excessive or suspicious tracking services were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear areas for improvement in compliance and security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including a security@ or abuse@ email address and consider publishing a security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking services to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed compliance and certification information to build trust with enterprise clients.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hyperbridge
Description
Hyperbridge is a coprocessor for cryptographically secure Interoperability.
Key services
Secure Interoperability, Permissionless Relayers, Token Gateway, Multichain Native Tokens, ISMP SDK
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js (implied by Nuxt.js usage), Nuxt.js, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. Content is focused on blockchain interoperability technology and developer tools.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No certifications or compliance frameworks mentioned.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML snippet provided.
  10. Website design is professional and mobile optimized.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating a contemporary and maintainable front-end architecture. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, which is a standard practice. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance appears moderate based on the use of multiple SVG assets and animations, which may impact load times on slower connections. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The technical stack is appropriate for a technology startup focused on developer tools and blockchain interoperability. Opportunities exist to improve performance and accessibility further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hyperbridge.network. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hyperbridge.network.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.