Skip to main content

Security report for hyperbeat.org

Hyperbeat · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hyperbeat is a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform focused on the HyperEVM blockchain ecosystem, offering users the ability to earn passive yield, borrow assets, and unlock leverage through automated strategies. The platform targets DeFi users and investors interested in leveraging Hyperliquid assets to grow their holdings. Positioned as a niche player within the HyperEVM space, Hyperbeat emphasizes ease of use and native leverage capabilities. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, and integrates blockchain wallet functionality via Privy. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Analytics are implemented through Google Tag Manager, indicating moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses embedded wallet iframes securely. However, explicit security headers are not clearly present, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and vulnerability disclosure reduces privacy compliance and security transparency. Overall, the website is professional and functional with a moderate trust level. The lack of WHOIS transparency and direct contact details slightly reduce credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency would enhance the platform's trustworthiness and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hyperbeat.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hyperbeat operates in the blockchain and DeFi sector, focusing on providing yield and leverage services on the HyperEVM platform. Its business model revolves around automated DeFi strategies and native leverage, targeting crypto investors and DeFi users. The platform leverages partnerships with social media and community channels such as Discord and X to engage its audience. Revenue streams likely include fees from borrowing and yield services. The company appears small in size with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. Growth indicators include active announcements and phased product launches. The ecosystem is supported by integrations with wallet providers and payment services like Moonpay. Strategic observations suggest a focus on user experience and niche market penetration within the HyperEVM community.

Security posture

Hyperbeat demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of embedded wallet technology via Privy indicates attention to secure user interactions. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No published security or incident response policies limit transparency and readiness perception. GDPR compliance is partial, with privacy and terms pages present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, reducing the platform's openness to responsible security reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from formalized policies, enhanced headers, and improved privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information availability with verified company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hyperbeat
Description
Use your Hyperliquid assets to earn, borrow, and grow. Hyperbeat simplifies DeFi on HyperEVM with automated strategies and native leverage.
Key services
Passive yield earning, Borrowing, Automated DeFi strategies, Native leverage on HyperEVM
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, Web3, Privy (embedded wallets), Google Tag Manager, Moonpay Web SDK
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web, HyperEVM blockchain
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of embedded wallet iframe with Privy
  • Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain trust analysis
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  5. Privacy and terms pages exist but cookie consent is missing
  6. Social media presence includes X and Discord links
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Content is focused on DeFi financial services on HyperEVM blockchain
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and scalability. Integration with blockchain wallet services via Privy and payment SDKs like Moonpay indicates a well-rounded technical infrastructure for DeFi operations. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility features and explicit security header implementation. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site approach, which can be beneficial for performance but requires careful content management. Overall, the technical stack is contemporary and suitable for the platform's needs, with minor gaps in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hyperbeat.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hyperbeat.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.