Skip to main content

Security report for hover.to

HOVER · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hover is a technology company specializing in providing an all-in-one software platform for construction, renovation, and insurance claims processing. Their SaaS solution enables contractors, builders, insurance professionals, and homeowners to measure, design, estimate, and manage projects efficiently using 3D modeling and AI-powered tools. The company holds a strong market position supported by partnerships with leading industry players and a large user base. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and professional branding. Technically, the website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Segment, and Intercom. It is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, appropriate security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good, though the site lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information. There are no detected vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns in WHOIS data, which aligns well with the business claims. The website is safe for general audiences and professionally maintained. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, adding incident response contacts, and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hover.to

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hover.to, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,340
Employees
2
Customers
1,337
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 16 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hover.to.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –manowar.hover.to2026-05-25
  • –hover.to2025-07-09

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hover operates in the intersection of technology, construction, and insurance sectors, offering SaaS solutions that streamline project scoping, measurement, and claims processing. Their business model focuses on subscription and usage-based revenue from professionals and homeowners. The company benefits from strong industry partnerships with major brands and insurance carriers, enhancing credibility and market reach. Their target customers include exterior contractors, home builders, insurance adjusters, and homeowners seeking design and renovation tools. The website content and structure indicate a focus on user experience and conversion, with clear CTAs for demos and free trials. Growth indicators include extensive integrations, mobile apps, and a broad service portfolio. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages digital marketing effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. The use of reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing is evident, though continuous monitoring of these scripts is recommended to avoid supply chain risks. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or suspicious WHOIS patterns were detected. Overall, the site aligns with best practices for web security and privacy compliance but could improve by formalizing security governance documentation and disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HOVER
Description
The one app to scope and sell every project. All your trades. All your people. All in one place. Contractors, adjusters, and homeowners trust Hover to get the job done.
Key services
3D measurement and modeling, Project scoping and selling, Insurance claim triage and settlement, Design inspiration and AI-powered design tools, Material takeoffs and estimates
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Wistia video embedding, Hotjar, Segment analytics, Intercom chat widget, jQuery
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS framework
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot backend

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Segment Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Segment Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong presence of industry partnerships and social proof.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on HubSpot CMS, utilizing a modern tech stack including jQuery, HubSpot analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Segment, and Wistia for video content. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and performance, with responsive design and fast loading times. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured JSON-LD data. The site uses multiple external domains for content delivery and analytics but maintains a clean and professional structure. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies that could impact operations. The technical infrastructure supports scalability and integration with industry partners effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hover.to. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hover.to.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.